» Articles » PMID: 39021371

Advancing Dentin-pulp Regeneration: Clinical Perspectives and Insights from Stem/progenitor Cell Transplantation (part II)

Overview
Journal Am J Stem Cells
Date 2024 Jul 18
PMID 39021371
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review evaluates clinical studies investigating regenerative endodontic procedures for mature/immature teeth utilizing stem cell transplantation. An electronic search of Scopus, PubMed, ISI Web Science, and Google Scholar was conducted up to January 2023. Outcome measures encompassed radiographic (periapical lesion, root length, apical foramen width, volume of the regenerated pulp) and clinical (post-operative pain, sensibility test) parameters. Among 3250 identified articles, five clinical studies were selected, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for mature/immature teeth, and three case reports/series for mature teeth. Despite the promising potential, the included studies exhibited a notable risk of bias. The diversity in stem cells (e.g., dental pulp stem cells [DPSCs], umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells [UC-MSCs]), scaffolds (Atecollagen, collagen membrane, platelet-poor plasma [PPP], leukocyte platelet-rich in fibrin [L-PRF]), and growth factors (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) emphasized the heterogeneity across interventions. In RCTs, DPSCs application increased root length and reduced apical foramen width in immature teeth, while UC-MSCs transplantation reduced apical lesions in mature teeth. Transplantation of DPSCs aggregates or UC-MSCs/PPP also elicited positive pulp responses and increased blood flow. In case reports/series, DPSCs application in teeth with irreversible pulpitis resulted in mineralization and increased the regenerated pulp' volume. Furthermore, transplantation of DPSCs with G-CSF/atelocollagen or L-PRF/collagen membrane led to positive pulp responses. While underscoring the potential of stem cell transplantation for regenerative endodontics in mature/immature teeth, the overall evidence quality and the limited number of available studies emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of results. Future well-designed clinical studies are essential to validate these findings further.

References
1.
El Ashiry E, Alamoudi N, El Ashiry M, Bastawy H, El Derwi D, Atta H . Tissue Engineering of Necrotic Dental Pulp of Immature Teeth with Apical Periodontitis in Dogs: Radiographic and Histological Evaluation. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018; 42(5):373-382. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.9. View

2.
Nakashima M, Fukuyama F, Iohara K . Pulp Regenerative Cell Therapy for Mature Molars: A Report of 2 Cases. J Endod. 2022; 48(10):1334-1340.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.07.010. View

3.
Lovelace T, Henry M, Hargreaves K, Diogenes A . Evaluation of the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells into the root canal space of necrotic immature teeth after clinical regenerative endodontic procedure. J Endod. 2011; 37(2):133-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.009. View

4.
El-Sayed K, Ahmed G, Abouauf E, Schwendicke F . Stem/progenitor cell-mediated pulpal tissue regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2019; 52(11):1573-1585. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13177. View

5.
Alghaithy R, Qualtrough A . Pulp sensibility and vitality tests for diagnosing pulpal health in permanent teeth: a critical review. Int Endod J. 2016; 50(2):135-142. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12611. View