» Articles » PMID: 39020274

Identifying the Obstacles Facing Emergency Nurses Regarding Treating CTAS1 and CTAS2 in Saudi Arabia

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 17
PMID 39020274
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Emergency nurses play a pivotal role in delivering efficient emergency healthcare, yet they often encounter numerous challenges, especially while managing life-threatening cases, impacting both their well-being and patient satisfaction. This study seeks to identify the prevalent challenges faced by these nurses in Saudi hospitals when handling Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS1 and CTAS2) cases, with the aim of mitigating or managing these issues in the future.

Methods: This study incorporated a mixed-method approach to identify obstacles in Emergency Department (ED) nursing treatment of CTAS1 and CTAS2 cases in two major Saudi Arabian hospitals. The research began with qualitative focus group interviews with expert ED nurses, followed by a quantitative survey to measure and explore relationships among the qualitative findings. Data analysis leveraged qualitative thematic analysis and principal component analysis, ensuring rigorous examination and validation of data to drive meaningful conclusions.

Findings: From expert interviews, key challenges for emergency nurses were identified, including resource management, communication, training compliance, and psychological factors. A survey of 172 nurses further distilled these into five major issues: patient care management, handling critical cases, administration support, patient care delay, and stress from patients' families.

Conclusion: Through a mixed-method approach, this study pinpoints five pivotal challenges confronting emergency nurses in Saudi hospitals. These encompass difficulties in patient care management, the psychological toll of handling critical cases, inadequate administrative support, delays due to extended patient stays, and the stress induced by the presence of patients' families, all of which significantly impede emergency department efficiency and compromise nurse well-being.

References
1.
Alquraini M, Awad E, Hijazi R . Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Emerg Med. 2015; 8(1):80. PMC: 4527972. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-015-0080-5. View

2.
Belayneh Z, Zegeye A, Tadesse E, Asrat B, Ayano G, Mekuriaw B . Level of anxiety symptoms and its associated factors among nurses working in emergency and intensive care unit at public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2021; 20(1):180. PMC: 8466700. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00701-4. View

3.
Ortiz-Barrios M, Alfaro-Saiz J . Methodological Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(8). PMC: 7216091. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082664. View

4.
Freund Y, Goulet H, Bokobza J, Ghanem A, Carreira S, Madec D . Factors associated with adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: two work better than one. J Emerg Med. 2013; 45(2):157-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.061. View

5.
Khaleghi P, Akbari H, Alavi N, Motalebi Kashani M, Batooli Z . Identification and analysis of human errors in emergency department nurses using SHERPA method. Int Emerg Nurs. 2022; 62:101159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101159. View