» Articles » PMID: 39018515

Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial

Abstract

JCO .Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.

Citing Articles

Benefit from dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: subgroup analyses from the randomised phase 3 PANTHER trial.

Matikas A, Papakonstantinou A, Loibl S, Steger G, Untch M, Johansson H Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 49:101162.

PMID: 39703564 PMC: 11652897. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101162.

References
1.
Brandberg Y, Johansson H, Hellstrom M, Gnant M, Mobus V, Greil R . Long-term (up to 16 months) health-related quality of life after adjuvant tailored dose-dense chemotherapy vs. standard three-weekly chemotherapy in women with high-risk early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 181(1):87-96. PMC: 7182635. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05602-9. View

2.
Burnell M, Levine M, Chapman J, Bramwell V, Gelmon K, Walley B . Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and Fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel versus Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 28(1):77-82. PMC: 2799234. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1077. View

3.
Citron M, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer E, Gradishar W . Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and.... J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(8):1431-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. View

4.
Simon R, Norton L . The Norton-Simon hypothesis: designing more effective and less toxic chemotherapeutic regimens. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006; 3(8):406-7. DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0560. View

5.
Sparano J, Zhao F, Martino S, Ligibel J, Perez E, Saphner T . Long-Term Follow-Up of the E1199 Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Taxane and Schedule in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(21):2353-60. PMC: 4500829. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9271. View