» Articles » PMID: 39018346

Estimated Reduction in Obesity Prevalence and Costs of a 20% and 30% Ad Valorem Excise Tax to Sugar-sweetened Beverages in Brazil: A Modeling Study

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 17
PMID 39018346
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with obesity, metabolic diseases, and incremental healthcare costs. Given their health consequences, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that countries implement taxes on SSB. Over the last 10 years, obesity prevalence has almost doubled in Brazil, yet, in 2016, the Brazilian government cut the existing federal SSB taxes to their current 4%. Since 2022, a bill to impose a 20% tax on SSB has been under discussion in the Brazilian Senate. To simulate the potential impact of increasing taxes on SSB in Brazil, we aimed to estimate the price-elasticity of SSB and the potential impact of a new 20% or 30% excise SSB tax on consumption, obesity prevalence, and cost savings.

Methods And Findings: Using household purchases data from the Brazilian Household Budget Survey (POF) from 2017/2018, we estimated constant elasticity regressions. We used a log-log specification by income level for all beverage categories: (1) sugar-sweetened beverages; (2) alcoholic beverages; (3) unsweetened beverages; and (4) low-calorie or artificially sweetened beverages. We estimated the adult nationwide baseline intake for each beverage category using 24-h dietary recall data collected in 2017/2018. Taking group one as the taxed beverages, we applied the price and cross-price elasticities to the baseline intake data, we obtained changes in caloric intake. The caloric reduction was introduced into an individual dynamic model to estimate changes in weight and obesity prevalence. No benefits on cost savings were modeled during the first 3 years of intervention to account for the time lag in obesity cases to reduce costs. We multiplied the reduction in obesity cases during 7 years by the obesity costs per capita to predict the costs savings attributable to the sweetened beverage tax. SSB price elasticities were higher among the lowest tertile of income (-1.24) than in the highest income tertile (-1.13), and cross-price elasticities suggest SSB were weakly substituted by milk, water, and 100% fruit juices. We estimated a caloric change of -17.3 kcal/day/person under a 20% excise tax and -25.9 kcal/day/person under a 30% tax. Ten years after implementation, a 20% tax is expected to reduce obesity prevalence by 6.7%; 9.1% for a 30% tax. These reductions translate into a -2.8 million and -3.8 million obesity cases for a 20% and 30% tax, respectively, and a reduction of $US 13.3 billion and $US 17.9 billion in obesity costs over 10 years for a 20% and 30% tax, respectively. Study limitations include using a quantile distribution method to adjust self-reported baseline weight and height, which could be insufficient to correct for reporting bias; also, weight, height, and physical activity were assumed to be steady over time.

Conclusions: Adding a 20% to 30% excise tax on top of Brazil's current federal tax could help to reduce the consumption of ultra-processed beverages, empty calories, and body weight while avoiding large health-related costs. Given the recent cuts to SSB taxes in Brazil, a program to revise and implement excise taxes could prove beneficial for the Brazilian population.

Citing Articles

Long-term trends and patterns in ultra-processed food consumption among Korean adults from 1998 to 2022.

Lee H, Yim Y, Cho Y, Oh J, Kim S, Son Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4131.

PMID: 39901034 PMC: 11790960. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88489-0.


Price elasticity of demand for ready-to-drink sugar-sweetened beverages in Brazil.

Venson A, Cardoso L, Santiago F, de Souza K, Bielemann R PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293413.

PMID: 37910576 PMC: 10619800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293413.

References
1.
Colchero M, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin B, Ng S . In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36(3):564-571. PMC: 5442881. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. View

2.
Singh G, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Lim S, Ezzati M, Mozaffarian D . Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010. Circulation. 2015; 132(8):639-66. PMC: 4550496. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636. View

3.
Flegal K, Graubard B, Ioannidis J . Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self-reported weight and height for measurement error. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021; 29(10):1700-1707. PMC: 8518702. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23239. View

4.
Lin B, Smith T, Lee J, Hall K . Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Econ Hum Biol. 2011; 9(4):329-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.08.007. View

5.
Caro J, Corvalan C, Reyes M, Silva A, Popkin B, Smith Taillie L . Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(7):e1002597. PMC: 6029755. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. View