» Articles » PMID: 39018277

Validation of Field-based Running Tests to Determine Maximal Aerobic Speed in Professional Rugby League

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Jul 17
PMID 39018277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Practitioners place importance on high-speed running (HSR) to monitor training practice and match-play demands, whilst attempting to maximise fitness and minimize the risk of injury occurrence. Practitioners apply various methods to quantify HSR, such as absolute thresholds, percentage of maximum sprint speed and maximal aerobic speed (MAS). A recent survey demonstrates the 5-minute run and 1200m shuttle test (ST) to be implemented among rugby league practitioners to quantify HSR by incorporating MAS. However, it is unclear as to how valid these methods are to accurately quantify MAS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the 5-minute run and 1200m ST when compared to a gold standard measure for MAS. Twenty 1st team professional rugby league players competing in the European Super League participated in this study. Players were required to complete an incremental treadmill test, 5-minute run and 1200m ST over a two-week period in pre-season. MAS, peak heart rate (HRmax), peak lactate (Lapeak) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) where collected upon completion of each test. Results demonstrated the 1200m ST to have a higher correlation for MAS than the 5-minute run (1200m ST: r = 0.73, 5-minute run: r = 0.64). However, when assessing validity using the level of agreement between data, the 5-minute run underreported MAS by 0.45 m·s-1 whereas the 1200m ST underreported MAS by 0.77 m·s-1. Ultimately, both field-based tests used in this study underreport MAS when compared to an incremental treadmill test, although the 5-minute run provides a closer agreement and therefore a more valid measurement for MAS than the 1200m ST.

References
1.
Achten J, Jeukendrup A . Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003; 33(7):517-38. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004. View

2.
Twist C, Highton J, Daniels M, Mill N, Close G . Player Responses to Match and Training Demands During an Intensified Fixture Schedule in Professional Rugby League: A Case Study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017; 12(8):1093-1099. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0390. View

3.
Gabbett T, Polley C, Dwyer D, Kearney S, Corvo A . Influence of field position and phase of play on the physical demands of match-play in professional rugby league forwards. J Sci Med Sport. 2013; 17(5):556-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.08.002. View

4.
Dabonneville M, Berthon P, Vaslin P, Fellmann N . The 5 min running field test: test and retest reliability on trained men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 88(4-5):353-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0617-1. View

5.
Mendez-Villanueva A, Buchheit M, Simpson B, Bourdon P . Match play intensity distribution in youth soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2012; 34(2):101-10. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306323. View