» Articles » PMID: 39017033

Open Access Data and Deep Learning for Cardiac Device Identification on Standard DICOM and Smartphone-based Chest Radiographs

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 17
PMID 39017033
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose To develop and evaluate a publicly available deep learning model for segmenting and classifying cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) and smartphone-based chest radiographs. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included patients with implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and cardiac monitors who underwent chest radiography between January 2012 and January 2022. A U-Net model with a ResNet-50 backbone was created to classify CIEDs on DICOM and smartphone images. Using 2321 chest radiographs in 897 patients (median age, 76 years [range, 18-96 years]; 625 male, 272 female), CIEDs were categorized into four manufacturers, 27 models, and one "other" category. Five smartphones were used to acquire 11 072 images. Performance was reported using the Dice coefficient on the validation set for segmentation or balanced accuracy on the test set for manufacturer and model classification, respectively. Results The segmentation tool achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.936 (IQR: 0.890-0.958). The model had an accuracy of 94.36% (95% CI: 90.93%, 96.84%; 251 of 266) for CIED manufacturer classification and 84.21% (95% CI: 79.31%, 88.30%; 224 of 266) for CIED model classification. Conclusion The proposed deep learning model, trained on both traditional DICOM and smartphone images, showed high accuracy for segmentation and classification of CIEDs on chest radiographs. Conventional Radiography, Segmentation . © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Celi in this issue.

Citing Articles

Smartphone Imaging and AI: A Commentary on Cardiac Device Classification.

Judice de Mattos Farina E, Celi L Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(5):e240418.

PMID: 39194390 PMC: 11427923. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.240418.

References
1.
Lauzier P, Gomes D, Weng W, Sadek M, Zakutney T, Bernier M . Detection and identification of cardiac implanted electronic devices in a large data set of chest radiographs using semi-supervised artificial intelligence methods. Heart Rhythm. 2023; 20(4):642-643. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.12.038. View

2.
Raatikainen M, Arnar D, Zeppenfeld K, Merino J, Kuck K, Hindricks G . Current trends in the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology member countries: 2015 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2015; 17 Suppl 4:iv1-72. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv265. View

3.
Weinreich M, Chudow J, Weinreich B, Krumerman T, Nag T, Rahgozar K . Development of an Artificially Intelligent Mobile Phone Application to Identify Cardiac Devices on Chest Radiography. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 5(9):1094-1095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.05.013. View

4.
Kotalczyk A, Kalarus Z, Wright D, Boriani G, Lip G . Cardiac Electronic Devices: Future Directions and Challenges. Med Devices (Auckl). 2020; 13:325-338. PMC: 7526741. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S245625. View

5.
Jacob S, Shahzad M, Maheshwari R, Panaich S, Aravindhakshan R . Cardiac rhythm device identification algorithm using X-Rays: CaRDIA-X. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(6):915-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.01.012. View