Changes in Household Wealth Over the Process of Widowhood Across European Countries

Overview

Journal J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci

Specialties Geriatrics
Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2024 Jul 16

PMID 39011933

Authors

Nicole Kapelle

Zachary Van Winkle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Widowhood has been shown to decrease surviving spouses' economic well-being. However, previous research has focused mostly on income-related outcomes, and has been less attentive to the importance of wealth, the processual nature of spousal death, and cross-national variation. In this study, we assessed how total, housing, and nonhousing wealth changes over the process of widowhood across 11 European countries.

Methods: Individual fixed-effects regressions and longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe were used to estimate how household net total wealth, housing wealth, and nonhousing wealth changed 3 years prior and 6 or more years after spousal death relative to 4 or more years prior to widowhood in 11 European countries.

Results: In all countries, household net wealth stayed relatively constant across the widowhood process, except for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Poland, where wealth declines were observed especially in the years following death. However, we found declines in housing wealth over the widowhood process, including prior to spousal death, across most countries in our sample, particularly in Austria, France, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Poland. Declines in housing wealth were generally not reflected by changes in nonhousing wealth but coincided with leaving homeownership and downsizing.

Discussion: Widowhood is associated with lower wealth, especially housing wealth, even in the years before spousal loss. Future research should focus on adjudicating the mechanisms behind country differences and exploring the implications of lost wealth following widowhood for surviving spouses' well-being and intergenerational transfers.

References

Holden K, Smock P . The economic costs of marital dissolution: why do women bear a disproportionate cost?. Annu Rev Sociol. 1991; 17:51-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000411. View

Raley R, Sweeney M . Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies: A Decade in Review. J Marriage Fam. 2024; 82(1):81-99. PMC: 10817771. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12651. View

Hungerford T . The economic consequences of widowhood on elderly women in the United States and Germany. Gerontologist. 2001; 41(1):103-10. DOI: 10.1093/geront/41.1.103. View

Kapelle N, Vidal S . Heterogeneity in Family Life Course Patterns and Intra-Cohort Wealth Disparities in Late Working Age. Eur J Popul. 2022; 38(1):59-92. PMC: 8924336. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-021-09601-4. View

Carr D, Utz R . Families in Later Life: A Decade in Review. J Marriage Fam. 2021; 82(1):346-363. PMC: 7904069. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12609. View

Pearlin L, Lieberman M, Menaghan E, Mullan J . The stress process. J Health Soc Behav. 1981; 22(4):337-56. View

Biro A . Adverse effects of widowhood in Europe. Adv Life Course Res. 2014; 18(1):68-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.005. View

Friedline T, Masa R, Chowa G . Transforming wealth: using the inverse hyperbolic sine (IHS) and splines to predict youth's math achievement. Soc Sci Res. 2014; 49:264-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.018. View

Borsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hunkler C, Kneip T, Korbmacher J, Malter F . Data Resource Profile: the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42(4):992-1001. PMC: 3780997. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt088. View

10.

Van Winkle Z, Leopold T . Family size and economic wellbeing following divorce: The United States in comparative perspective. Soc Sci Res. 2021; 96:102541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102541. View

11.

Angel J, Jimenez M, Angel R . The economic consequences of widowhood for older minority women. Gerontologist. 2007; 47(2):224-34. DOI: 10.1093/geront/47.2.224. View

12.

Zueras P, Rutigliano R, Trias-Llimos S . Marital status, living arrangements, and mortality in middle and older age in Europe. Int J Public Health. 2020; 65(5):627-636. PMC: 7360666. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01371-w. View

13.

Haveman R, Holden K, Wilson K, Wolfe B . Social security, age of retirement, and economic well-being: intertemporal and demographic patterns among retired-worker beneficiaries. Demography. 2003; 40(2):369-94. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0012. View

14.

Modigliani F . Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations. Science. 1986; 234(4777):704-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.234.4777.704. View

15.

Teggi D . Care homes as hospices for the prevalent form of dying: An analysis of long-term care provision towards the end of life in England. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 260:113150. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113150. View

16.

Kessler R . Stress, social status, and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav. 1979; 20(3):259-72. View

17.

Killewald A, Pfeffer F, Schachner J . WEALTH INEQUALITY AND ACCUMULATION. Annu Rev Sociol. 2017; 43:379-404. PMC: 5546759. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053331. View