» Articles » PMID: 39011347

Norwegian Male U14 Soccer Players Have Superior Running Capacity Compared to Icelandic Players

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 16
PMID 39011347
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The organisation and development strategies of youth soccer differ between Norway and Iceland. Whether this affect physical capacity is unknown. Thus, the first aim of the present study is to compare physical capacity between players from Iceland and Norway. Secondary aim is to assess associations between biological maturity and physical capacity in the Icelandic players since an association previously has been shown among the Norwegians. There were 48 U14 players from Iceland included and 103 players from Norway. Bone age (BA), measured with left-wrist x-ray, was used as an indicator of biological maturity. To measure physical capacity, 40 metre (m) linear sprint, standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (IR1-test) and a maximal oxygen uptake test (VO) were used. Training load was assessed by questionnaire. The results showed that the Norwegian players ran faster (5.90 ± 0.38 vs. 6.37 ± 0.44 s,  < .001), had better intermittent endurance capacity (1,235 ± 461 vs. 960 ± 423 m,  < .001) and higher VO, (60.3 ± 6.5 vs. 54.8 ± 5.3 ml·kg·min,  < .001) than the Icelandic players. The players from Norway reported a higher number of weekly organised soccer training hours than the Icelandic. We also found significant correlations between BA and performance on 40 m linear sprint (r = -.566,  < .001), SLJ (r = .380,  = .008) and CMJ (r = .354,  = .014) among the Icelandic players. Moreover, no correlations were found between BA and VO or intermittent endurance capacity. In conclusion, the Norwegian players ran faster and had better VO and intermittent endurance capacity than the Icelandic players. Biological maturity level was associated with speed and jumping performance in U14 soccer players in Iceland, but not with VO or intermittent endurance capacity. Findings indicate that more research is needed to investigate the influence of different organisation and structure of youth soccer between the two countries on physical capacity.

References
1.
Bongiovanni T, Trecroci A, Cavaggioni L, Rossi A, Perri E, Pasta G . Importance of anthropometric features to predict physical performance in elite youth soccer: a machine learning approach. Res Sports Med. 2020; 29(3):213-224. DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2020.1809410. View

2.
Deprez D, Fransen J, Lenoir M, Philippaerts R, Vaeyens R . A retrospective study on anthropometrical, physical fitness, and motor coordination characteristics that influence dropout, contract status, and first-team playing time in high-level soccer players aged eight to eighteen years. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(6):1692-704. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000806. View

3.
Haugen T, Buchheit M . Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerations. Sports Med. 2015; 46(5):641-56. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0446-0. View

4.
Ford P, Bordonau J, Bonanno D, Tavares J, Groenendijk C, Fink C . A survey of talent identification and development processes in the youth academies of professional soccer clubs from around the world. J Sports Sci. 2020; 38(11-12):1269-1278. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1752440. View

5.
Krustrup P, Mohr M, Amstrup T, Rysgaard T, Johansen J, Steensberg A . The yo-yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(4):697-705. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000058441.94520.32. View