» Articles » PMID: 39008026

Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Two Aspirin Formulations in the Caribbean: The ARC Study

Abstract

Introduction: This prospective, single-arm, crossover pharmacodynamic study assessed the effect of Bayer low-dose enteric-coated aspirin 81 mg tablets (LD EC-ASA) (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) compared to Vazalore low-dose phospholipid-aspirin liquid-filled 81 mg capsules (LD PL-ASA) (PLx Pharma Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA) on platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin reaction units (ARU).

Methods: Forty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Platelet function was evaluated with the VerifyNow™ ARU assay (Werfen, Bedford, MA, USA) and assessed post-initiation of Bayer LD EC-ASA daily for 14 days, with a washout period of 28 days, followed by Vazalore LD PL-ASA daily for 14 days, again followed by ARU testing.

Results: Participants on LD EC-ASA had a mean ARU score of 426, with 19.1% of participants having an ARU > 550; patients on LD PL-ASA derived a mean ARU score of 435, with 14.9% achieving an ARU > 550. There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance (ARU > 550) according to the formulation (Bayer LD EC-ASA vs. Vazalore LD PL-ASA) used. Aspirin resistance was independent of ethnicity regardless of the formulation used. In addition, there were no significant associations between body surface area (BSA) and Bayer LD EC-ASA ARU value (p value 0.788) or Vazalore LD PL-ASA ARU value (p value 0.477). No patients experienced any serious adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance between Bayer LD EC-ASA and Vazalore LD PL-ASA. This dedicated pharmacodynamic study could potentially be informative and applicable for Trinidadian patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Further studies are required to confirm these exploratory findings.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06228820, prospectively registered 1/18/2024.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Colchicine on Platelet Function Profiles in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ECLIPSE Pilot Study.

Seecheran N, Grimaldos K, McCallum P, Ramcharan P, Kawall J, Katwaroo A Cardiol Ther. 2025; 14(1):87-100.

PMID: 39826082 PMC: 11893921. DOI: 10.1007/s40119-024-00393-2.

References
1.
Dalen J . Aspirin resistance: is it real? Is it clinically significant?. Am J Med. 2007; 120(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.023. View

2.
Davidson K, Barry M, Mangione C, Cabana M, Chelmow D, Coker T . Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2022; 327(16):1577-1584. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.4983. View

3.
Jones D, Persad-Ramdeensingh S, Abrahim S, Seecheran N, Haraksingh R . Prevalence of CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 Allelic Variants and Clopidogrel Use in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Trinidad & Tobago. Cardiol Ther. 2024; 13(1):191-203. PMC: 10899551. DOI: 10.1007/s40119-024-00348-7. View

4.
Turner B, Steinberg J, Weeks B, Rodriguez F, Cullen M . Race/ethnicity reporting and representation in US clinical trials: a cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022; 11. PMC: 9302767. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100252. View

5.
Angiolillo D, Bhatt D, Lanza F, Cryer B, Dong J, Jeske W . Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of a novel, pharmaceutical lipid-aspirin complex: results of a randomized, crossover, bioequivalence study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019; 48(4):554-562. PMC: 6800884. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-01933-7. View