Engrams: From Behavior to Brain-Wide Networks

Overview

Journal Adv Neurobiol

Publisher Springer

Date 2024 Jul 15

PMID 39008008

Authors

Kaitlyn E Dorst

Steve Ramirez

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Animals utilize a repertoire of behavioral responses during everyday experiences. During a potentially dangerous encounter, defensive actions such as "fight, flight, or freeze" are selected for survival. The successful use of behavior is determined by a series of real-time computations combining an animal's internal (i.e., body) and external (i.e., environment) state. Brain-wide neural pathways are engaged throughout this process to detect stimuli, integrate information, and command behavioral output. The hippocampus, in particular, plays a role in the encoding and storing of the episodic information surrounding these encounters as putative "engram" or experience-modified cellular ensembles. Recalling a negative experience then reactivates a dedicated engram ensemble and elicits a behavioral response. How hippocampus-based engrams modulate brain-wide states and an animal's internal/external milieu to influence behavior is an exciting area of investigation for contemporary neuroscience. In this chapter, we provide an overview of recent technological advancements that allow researchers to tag, manipulate, and visualize putative engram ensembles, with an overarching goal of casually connecting their brain-wide underpinnings to behavior. We then discuss how hippocampal fear engrams alter behavior in a manner that is contingent on an environment's physical features as well as how they influence brain-wide patterns of cellular activity. Overall, we propose here that studies on memory engrams offer an exciting avenue for contemporary neuroscience to casually link the activity of cells to cognition and behavior while also offering testable theoretical and experimental frameworks for how the brain organizes experience.

References

Abraham W, Dragunow M, Tate W . The role of immediate early genes in the stabilization of long-term potentiation. Mol Neurobiol. 1991; 5(2-4):297-314. DOI: 10.1007/BF02935553. View

Blanchard D, Shepherd J, de Padua Carobrez A, Blanchard R . Sex effects in defensive behavior: baseline differences and drug interactions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991; 15(4):461-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80132-0. View

Boyden E . A history of optogenetics: the development of tools for controlling brain circuits with light. F1000 Biol Rep. 2011; 3:11. PMC: 3155186. DOI: 10.3410/B3-11. View

Bullmore E, Sporns O . Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(3):186-98. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2575. View

Chen B, Murawski N, Cincotta C, McKissick O, Finkelstein A, Hamidi A . Artificially Enhancing and Suppressing Hippocampus-Mediated Memories. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(11):1885-1894.e4. PMC: 6548647. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.065. View

Colom-Lapetina J, Li A, Pelegrina-Perez T, Shansky R . Behavioral Diversity Across Classic Rodent Models Is Sex-Dependent. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13:45. PMC: 6414415. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00045. View

Denny C, Kheirbek M, Alba E, Tanaka K, Brachman R, Laughman K . Hippocampal memory traces are differentially modulated by experience, time, and adult neurogenesis. Neuron. 2014; 83(1):189-201. PMC: 4169172. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.018. View

Dragunow M . A role for immediate-early transcription factors in learning and memory. Behav Genet. 1996; 26(3):293-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02359385. View

Eichenbaum H . Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 15(11):732-44. PMC: 4348090. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3827. View

10.

Fanselow M . Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1980; 15(4):177-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF03001163. View

11.

Fanselow M . Negative valence systems: sustained threat and the predatory imminence continuum. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2022; 6(5):467-477. PMC: 9788377. DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20220003. View

12.

Fendt M, Fanselow M . The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of conditioned fear. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999; 23(5):743-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00016-0. View

13.

Frankland P, Josselyn S, Kohler S . The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval. Nat Neurosci. 2019; 22(10):1576-1585. PMC: 6903648. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0493-1. View

14.

Fyhn M, Molden S, Witter M, Moser E, Moser M . Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science. 2004; 305(5688):1258-64. DOI: 10.1126/science.1099901. View

15.

Gabrieli J . Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998; 49:87-115. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.87. View

16.

Good M, Barnes P, Staal V, McGregor A, Honey R . Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2007; 121(1):218-23. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.1.218. View

17.

Gross C, Canteras N . The many paths to fear. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(9):651-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3301. View

18.

Grossen N, Kelley M . Species-specific behavior and acquisition of avoidance behavior in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972; 81(2):307-10. DOI: 10.1037/h0033536. View

19.

Gruene T, Flick K, Stefano A, Shea S, Shansky R . Sexually divergent expression of active and passive conditioned fear responses in rats. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4709260. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.11352. View

20.

Guzowski J, Timlin J, Roysam B, McNaughton B, Worley P, Barnes C . Mapping behaviorally relevant neural circuits with immediate-early gene expression. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(5):599-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.08.018. View