» Articles » PMID: 39007021

Assessment of the Impact of Technical Incidents in Critical Situations Using High-Fidelity Simulation Techniques in Pediatric Intensive Care

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Jul 15
PMID 39007021
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction In certain fields such as anesthesia and critical care, technical incidents are rare events; however, when they occur, they disrupt workflow, optimal patient care, and survival, with human factors often implicated. In pediatric resuscitation, the impact of these incidents on patient care has not yet been thoroughly explored through simulation. Consequently, we investigated how healthcare teams integrate technical incidents in critical situations and whether this interferes with the adequate management of patients. Materials & methods In a single-blind randomized study utilizing high-fidelity simulation, we incorporated a pediatric scenario involving hypoxemia in an intubated and ventilated infant where the endotracheal tube (ETT) was obstructed. A technical incident (disconnected oxygen supply) was either present (TI+) or absent (TI-) in the scenario. We compared reaction times for "removal of the obstructed ETT" between the two groups (TI+ and TI-). Additionally, we recorded and analyzed reaction times for "bag ventilation" and "repair of the technical incident" in the TI+ group. To assess the scenario's credibility, we conducted an analysis comparing the medians of evaluation forms that were anonymously completed by participants at the end of the sessions. Results In total, 10 simulation sessions were conducted, five TI+ and five TI-. The time required for removal of the obstructed ETT in the presence of a technical incident was significantly prolonged compared to controls (Mann-Whitney test, =0.03). Furthermore, bag ventilation precedes tube removal in the TI+ group, a contrast to the TI- group, which quickly removes the obstructed ETT before stabilizing the patient with bag-mask ventilation. Conclusion Technical incidents in simulated pediatric scenario adversely affect urgent care in ventilated children. Developing and validating a procedural response to these situations through further simulation is imperative.

References
1.
Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebo S, ODonnell J . Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6 Suppl:S10-3. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96. View

2.
Katheria A, Rich W, Finer N . Development of a strategic process using checklists to facilitate team preparation and improve communication during neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013; 84(11):1552-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.012. View

3.
Fasting S, Gisvold S . Equipment problems during anaesthesia--are they a quality problem?. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(6):825-31. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aef276. View

4.
Xu Y, Malik N, Chernbumroong S, Vassallo J, Keene D, Foster M . Triage in major incidents: development and external validation of novel machine learning-derived primary and secondary triage tools. Emerg Med J. 2023; 41(3):176-183. PMC: 10894820. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212440. View

5.
Clebone A, Burian B, Watkins S, Galvez J, Lockman J, Heitmiller E . The Development and Implementation of Cognitive Aids for Critical Events in Pediatric Anesthesia: The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Critical Events Checklists. Anesth Analg. 2017; 124(3):900-907. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001746. View