» Articles » PMID: 39006104

Decreased Strength, Complication Rate and Higher Satisfaction in Conservative Treatment of Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Compared to Surgical Treatment: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Jul 15
PMID 39006104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Treatment modalities for partial distal biceps tendon (DBT) ruptures include conservative management (immobilization, medication, and physical therapy) or surgery. Selecting treatment modality can present a challenge to both patient and provider.

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that patients undergoing surgical treatment for partial DBT rupture would have higher complications but better overall strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction.

Study Design: Systematic Review.

Methods: A systematic review was performed in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were searched for studies published through May 2023. Studies were included if they examined patients with a partial DBT rupture who underwent treatment. Exclusion criteria were non-human studies, studies not in English, reviews, technical notes, letters to the editor, surgical technique papers, and studies reported in a prior review.

Results: 13 studies consisting of 290 patients with a partial DBT tear were included in this review. 75% of the patients were male and the ages ranged from 23 - 75 years. The follow up for the patients ranged from 1 - 94 months. 55 patients underwent conservative treatment versus 256 patients underwent surgical treatment. Outcomes examined by the studies included pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), complications, patient reported outcomes (PROs), return to activity, and patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: Treatment for partial DBT tear via surgery or conservative treatment both produce good clinical outcomes. There are similar outcomes between treatment options for pain and ROM. Conservative treatment had some poorer outcomes in terms of strength after treatment. Surgical treatment had more complications and a few patients with decreased satisfaction. Overall, both are viable treatment options, requiring a physician and patient discussion regarding the pros and cons of both options as a part of a shared decision-making process that incorporates patient priorities.

References
1.
Giombini A, Innocenzi L, Di Cesare A, Di Salvo W, Fagnani F, Pigozzi F . Partial rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon in elite waterpolo goalkeeper: a case report of conservative treatment. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007; 47(1):79-83. View

2.
Cain R, Nydick J, Stein M, Williams B, Polikandriotis J, Hess A . Complications following distal biceps repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(10):2112-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.022. View

3.
Dellaero D, Mallon W . Surgical treatment of partial biceps tendon ruptures at the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(2):215-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.020. View

4.
Schmidt G, Fischer J, Crosby N, Hoyer R . Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2023; 49(9):930.e1-930.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.11.015. View

5.
Amarasooriya M, Bain G, Roper T, Bryant K, Iqbal K, Phadnis J . Complications After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(12):3103-3111. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519899933. View