» Articles » PMID: 39005992

Nonlinear and Threshold Effects of Built Environment on Older Adults' Walking Duration: Do Age and Retirement Status Matter?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jul 15
PMID 39005992
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Walking plays a crucial role in promoting physical activity among older adults. Understanding how the built environment influences older adults' walking behavior is vital for promoting physical activity and healthy aging. Among voluminous literature investigating the environmental correlates of walking behaviors of older adults, few have focused on walking duration across different age groups and life stages, let alone examined the potential nonlinearities and thresholds of the built environment.

Methods: This study employs travel diary from Zhongshan, China and the gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT) approach to disentangle the age and retirement status differences in the nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on older adults' walking duration.

Results: The results showed built environment attributes collectively contribute 57.37% for predicting older adults' walking duration, with a higher predicting power for the old-old (70+ years) or the retired. The most influencing built environment attribute for the young-old (60-70 years) is bus stop density, whereas the relative importance of population density, bus stop density, and accessibility to green space or commercial facilities is close for the old-old. The retired tend to walk longer in denser-populated neighborhoods with better bus service, but the non-retired are more active in walking in mixed-developed environments with accessible commercial facilities. The thresholds of bus stop density to encourage walking among the young-old is 7.8 counts/km, comparing to 6 counts/km among the old-old. Regarding the green space accessibility, the effective range for the non-retired (4 to 30%) is smaller than that of the retired (12 to 45%).

Discussion: Overall, the findings provide nuanced and diverse interventions for creating walking-friendly neighborhoods to promote walking across different sub-groups of older adults.

Citing Articles

How to improve public environmental health by facilitating metro usage on weekend: exploring the non-linear and threshold impacts of the built environment.

Peng B, Wang T, Zhang Y, Li C Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1469578.

PMID: 39559377 PMC: 11572129. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469578.

References
1.
Yen I, Anderson L . Built environment and mobility of older adults: important policy and practice efforts. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60(5):951-6. PMC: 4534005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03949.x. View

2.
Bentley R, Blakely T, Kavanagh A, Aitken Z, King T, McElwee P . A Longitudinal Study Examining Changes in Street Connectivity, Land Use, and Density of Dwellings and Walking for Transport in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Health Perspect. 2018; 126(5):057003. PMC: 6072026. DOI: 10.1289/EHP2080. View

3.
Dawson J, Hillsdon M, Boller I, Foster C . Perceived barriers to walking in the neighborhood environment: a survey of middle-aged and older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2007; 15(3):318-35. DOI: 10.1123/japa.15.3.318. View

4.
Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Kolt G . Green space is associated with walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in middle-to-older-aged adults: findings from 203 883 Australians in the 45 and Up Study. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 48(5):404-6. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092006. View

5.
Cerin E, Barnett A, Zhang C, Lai P, Sit C, Lee R . How urban densification shapes walking behaviours in older community dwellers: a cross-sectional analysis of potential pathways of influence. Int J Health Geogr. 2020; 19(1):14. PMC: 7164360. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-020-00210-8. View