Understanding 'error' in the Forensic Sciences: A Primer

Overview

Journal Forensic Sci Int Synerg

Specialty Forensic Sciences

Date 2024 Jul 15

PMID 39005839

Authors

Kristy A Martire

Jason M Chin

Carolyn Davis

Gary Edmond

Bethany Growns

Stacey Gorski

Richard I Kemp

Zara Lee

Christopher M Verdon

Gabrielle Jansen

Tanya Lang

Tess M S Neal

Rachel A Searston

Joshua Slocum

Stephanie Summersby

Jason M Tangen

Matthew B Thompson

Alice Towler

Darren Watson

Melissa V Werrett

Mariam Younan

Kaye N Ballantyne

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper distils seven key lessons about 'error' from a collaborative webinar series between practitioners at Victoria Police Forensic Services Department and academics. It aims to provide the common understanding of error necessary to foster interdisciplinary dialogue, collaboration and research. The lessons underscore the inevitability, complexity and subjectivity of error, as well as opportunities for learning and growth. Ultimately, we argue that error can be a potent tool for continuous improvement and accountability, enhancing the reliability of forensic sciences and public trust. It is hoped the shared understanding provided by this paper will support future initiatives and funding for collaborative developments in this vital domain.

Citing Articles

Transparency and diversity to advance legal-scientific communication.

Chin J, Baker J Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 9:100557.

PMID: 39350910 PMC: 11440334. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100557.

A plan for systematic reviews for high-need areas in forensic science.

Chin J, Arabia A, McKinnon M, Page M, Searston R Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 9:100542.

PMID: 39285892 PMC: 11402541. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100542.

References

Andrade C . HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021; 82(1). DOI: 10.4088/JCP.20f13804. View

Almazrouei M, Dror I, Morgan R . Organizational and Human Factors Affecting Forensic Decision-Making: Workplace Stress and Feedback. J Forensic Sci. 2020; 65(6):1968-1977. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14542. View

Murrie D, Gardner B, Kelley S, Dror I . Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 302:109887. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109887. View

Dror I, Scurich N . (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021; 2:333-338. PMC: 7770438. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006. View

Reason J . Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000; 320(7237):768-70. PMC: 1117770. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768. View

Frese M, Keith N . Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:661-87. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205. View

Weyermann C, Willis S, Margot P, Roux C . Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development. Forensic Sci Int. 2023; 348:111592. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111592. View

Mitchell P . What's in a name? Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary. J Prof Nurs. 2005; 21(6):332-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.009. View

Christensen A, Crowder C, Ousley S, Houck M . Error and its meaning in forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 2013; 59(1):123-6. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12275. View

10.

Kloosterman A, Sjerps M, Quak A . Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014; 12:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.014. View

11.

Eldridge H, Stimac J, Vanderkolk J . The benefits of errors during training. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022; 4:100207. PMC: 9136334. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100207. View

12.

Howes L, Kirkbride K, Kelty S, Julian R, Kemp N . The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: reports of forensic comparison of glass. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 236:54-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.031. View

13.

Rosenfield P . The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 35(11):1343-57. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-r. View

14.

Houck M . Backlogs are a dynamic system, not a warehousing problem. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020; 2:317-324. PMC: 7662868. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.003. View

15.

Eldridge H . Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020; 1:24-34. PMC: 7219164. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.001. View

16.

Morrissey J, Stodter A, Sherratt F, Cole M . Partnership between academics and practitioners - Addressing the challenges in forensic science. Sci Justice. 2023; 63(1):74-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.005. View

17.

Davis D, OBrien M, Freemantle N, Wolf F, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A . Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. JAMA. 1999; 282(9):867-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.9.867. View

18.

Carr S, Piasecki E, Gallop A . Demonstrating reliability through transparency: A scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings. Forensic Sci Int. 2020; 308:110110. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110110. View

19.

Nittis M, Stark M . Evidence based practice: laboratory feedback informs forensic specimen collection in NSW. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014; 25:38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.008. View

20.

Baudry L, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R, Choller D . Auditory concurrent feedback benefits on the circle performed in gymnastics. J Sports Sci. 2005; 24(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1080/02640410500130979. View