» Articles » PMID: 39005271

Differential Aging Effects on Implicit and Explicit Sensorimotor Learning

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Jul 15
PMID 39005271
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Deterioration in motor control is a hallmark of aging, significantly contributing to a decline in quality of life. More controversial is the question of whether and how aging impacts sensorimotor learning. We hypothesized that the inconsistent picture observed in the current literature can be attributed to at least two factors. First, aging studies tend to be underpowered. Second, the learning assays used in these experiments tend to reflect, to varying degrees, the operation of multiple learning processes, making it difficult to make inferences across studies. We took a two-pronged approach to address these issues. We first performed a meta-analysis of the sensorimotor adaptation literature focusing on outcome measures that provide estimates of explicit and implicit components of adaptation. We then conducted two well-powered experiments to re-examine the effect of aging on sensorimotor adaptation, using behavioral tasks designed to isolate explicit and implicit processes. Convergently, both approaches revealed a striking dissociation: Older individuals exhibited a marked impairment in their ability to discover an explicit strategy to counteract a visuomotor perturbation. However, they exhibited enhanced implicit recalibration. We hypothesize that the effect of aging on explicit learning reflects an age-related decline in reasoning and problem solving, and the effect of aging on implicit learning reflects age-related changes in multisensory integration. Taken together, these findings deepen our understanding of the impact of aging on sensorimotor learning.

References
1.
Haith A, Huberdeau D, Krakauer J . The influence of movement preparation time on the expression of visuomotor learning and savings. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(13):5109-17. PMC: 6705405. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3869-14.2015. View

2.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

3.
Ranganathan R, Tomlinson A, Lokesh R, Lin T, Patel P . A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms. Exp Brain Res. 2020; 239(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05908-6. View

4.
Huberdeau D, Krakauer J, Haith A . Dual-process decomposition in human sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015; 33:71-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.003. View

5.
Therrien A, Wong A . Mechanisms of Human Motor Learning Do Not Function Independently. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 15:785992. PMC: 8764186. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.785992. View