» Articles » PMID: 39005260

A Novel Behavioral Paradigm Using Mice to Study Predictive Postural Control

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Jul 15
PMID 39005260
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postural control circuitry performs the essential function of maintaining balance and body position in response to perturbations that are either self-generated (e.g. reaching to pick up an object) or externally delivered (e.g. being pushed by another person). Human studies have shown that anticipation of predictable postural disturbances can modulate such responses. This indicates that postural control could involve higher-level neural structures associated with predictive functions, rather than being purely reactive. However, the underlying neural circuitry remains largely unknown. To enable studies of predictive postural control circuits, we developed a novel experimental paradigm for . In this paradigm, modeled after human studies, a dynamic platform generated reproducible translational perturbations. While mice stood bipedally atop a perch to receive water rewards, they experienced backward translations that were either unpredictable or preceded by an auditory cue. To validate the paradigm, we investigated the effect of the auditory cue on postural responses to perturbations across multiple days in three mice. These preliminary results serve to validate a new postural control experimental paradigm, opening the door to the types of neural recordings and circuit manipulations that are currently possible in mice.

References
1.
Horak F, Diener H . Cerebellar control of postural scaling and central set in stance. J Neurophysiol. 1994; 72(2):479-93. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.479. View

2.
Kolb F, Lachauer S, Maschke M, Timmann D . Classically conditioned postural reflex in cerebellar patients. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 158(2):163-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1889-y. View

2.
Nashner L, Cordo P . Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles. Exp Brain Res. 1981; 43(3-4):395-405. DOI: 10.1007/BF00238382. View

3.
Kolb F, Timmann D, Baier P, Diener H . Classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients. 2. Impaired unconditioned responses. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(4):471-85. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900226. View

4.
Bastian A . Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006; 16(6):645-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016. View