» Articles » PMID: 39003314

Idiosyncratic Fixation Patterns Generalize Across Dynamic and Static Facial Expression Recognition

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jul 13
PMID 39003314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial expression recognition (FER) is crucial for understanding the emotional state of others during human social interactions. It has been assumed that humans share universal visual sampling strategies to achieve this task. However, recent studies in face identification have revealed striking idiosyncratic fixation patterns, questioning the universality of face processing. More importantly, very little is known about whether such idiosyncrasies extend to the biological relevant recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions of emotion (FEEs). To clarify this issue, we tracked observers' eye movements categorizing static and ecologically valid dynamic faces displaying the six basic FEEs, all normalized for time presentation (1 s), contrast and global luminance across exposure time. We then used robust data-driven analyses combining statistical fixation maps with hidden Markov Models to explore eye-movements across FEEs and stimulus modalities. Our data revealed three spatially and temporally distinct equally occurring face scanning strategies during FER. Crucially, such visual sampling strategies were mostly comparably effective in FER and highly consistent across FEEs and modalities. Our findings show that spatiotemporal idiosyncratic gaze strategies also occur for the biologically relevant recognition of FEEs, further questioning the universality of FER and, more generally, face processing.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Role of Foveal and Extrafoveal Processing in Emotion Recognition: A Gaze-Contingent Study.

Estudillo A Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001766 PMC: 11851736. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020135.

References
1.
Blais C, Fiset D, Roy C, Saumure Regimbald C, Gosselin F . Eye fixation patterns for categorizing static and dynamic facial expressions. Emotion. 2017; 17(7):1107-1119. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000283. View

2.
Coutrot A, Binetti N, Harrison C, Mareschal I, Johnston A . Face exploration dynamics differentiate men and women. J Vis. 2016; 16(14):16. DOI: 10.1167/16.14.16. View

3.
Nusseck M, Cunningham D, Wallraven C, Bulthoff H . The contribution of different facial regions to the recognition of conversational expressions. J Vis. 2008; 8(8):1.1-23. DOI: 10.1167/8.8.1. View

4.
Vaidya A, Jin C, Fellows L . Eye spy: the predictive value of fixation patterns in detecting subtle and extreme emotions from faces. Cognition. 2014; 133(2):443-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.004. View

5.
Gold J, Barker J, Barr S, Bittner J, Bromfield W, Chu N . The efficiency of dynamic and static facial expression recognition. J Vis. 2013; 13(5). PMC: 3666543. DOI: 10.1167/13.5.23. View