» Articles » PMID: 39003243

Muscle-Driven Predictive Physics Simulations of Quadrupedal Locomotion in the Horse

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jul 13
PMID 39003243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Musculoskeletal simulations can provide insights into the underlying mechanisms that govern animal locomotion. In this study, we describe the development of a new musculoskeletal model of the horse, and to our knowledge present the first fully muscle-driven, predictive simulations of equine locomotion. Our goal was to simulate a model that captures only the gross musculoskeletal structure of a horse, without specialized morphological features. We mostly present simulations acquired using feedforward control, without state feedback ("top-down control"). Without using kinematics or motion capture data as an input, we have simulated a variety of gaits that are commonly used by horses (walk, pace, trot, tölt, and collected gallop). We also found a selection of gaits that are not normally seen in horses (half bound, extended gallop, ambling). Due to the clinical relevance of the trot, we performed a tracking simulation that included empirical joint angle deviations in the cost function. To further demonstrate the flexibility of our model, we also present a simulation acquired using spinal feedback control, where muscle control signals are wholly determined by gait kinematics. Despite simplifications to the musculature, simulated footfalls and ground reaction forces followed empirical patterns. In the tracking simulation, kinematics improved with respect to the fully predictive simulations, and muscle activations showed a reasonable correspondence to electromyographic signals, although we did not predict any anticipatory firing of muscles. When sequentially increasing the target speed, our simulations spontaneously predicted walk-to-run transitions at the empirically determined speed. However, predicted stride lengths were too short over nearly the entire speed range unless explicitly prescribed in the controller, and we also did not recover spontaneous transitions to asymmetric gaits such as galloping. Taken together, our model performed adequately when simulating individual gaits, but our simulation workflow was not able to capture all aspects of gait selection. We point out certain aspects of our workflow that may have caused this, including anatomical simplifications and the use of massless Hill-type actuators. Our model is an extensible, generalized horse model, with considerable scope for adding anatomical complexity. This project is intended as a starting point for continual development of the model and code that we make available in extensible open-source formats.

References
1.
Modenese L, Gopalakrishnan A, Phillips A . Application of a falsification strategy to a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb and accuracy of the predicted hip contact force vector. J Biomech. 2013; 46(6):1193-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.045. View

2.
Buchner H, Savelberg H, Schamhardt H, Barneveld A . Inertial properties of Dutch Warmblood horses. J Biomech. 1997; 30(6):653-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00005-5. View

3.
Rhodin M, Smit I, Persson-Sjodin E, Pfau T, Gunnarsson V, Bjornsdottir S . Timing of Vertical Head, Withers and Pelvis Movements Relative to the Footfalls in Different Equine Gaits and Breeds. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(21). PMC: 9657284. DOI: 10.3390/ani12213053. View

4.
De Groote F, Kinney A, Rao A, Fregly B . Evaluation of Direct Collocation Optimal Control Problem Formulations for Solving the Muscle Redundancy Problem. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44(10):2922-2936. PMC: 5043004. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1591-9. View

5.
Marsh R . Deactivation rate and shortening velocity as determinants of contractile frequency. Am J Physiol. 1990; 259(2 Pt 2):R223-30. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.2.R223. View