» Articles » PMID: 39001547

Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening with 7-Type HPV MRNA E6/E7 Testing on Self-Collected Samples: Multicentric Insights from Mexico

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 13
PMID 39001547
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a significant public health issue, particularly in regions with low screening uptake. This study evaluates the effectiveness of self-sampling and the 7-type HPV mRNA E6/E7 test in improving cervical cancer screening outcomes among a referral population in Mexico. A cohort of 418 Mexican women aged 25 to 65, referred for colposcopy and biopsy due to abnormal cytology results (ASC-US+), participated in this study. Self-samples were analyzed using both the 14-type HPV DNA test and the 7-type HPV mRNA E6/E7 test. The study assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and the necessity of colposcopies to detect CIN3+ lesions. Participant acceptability of self-sampling was also evaluated through a questionnaire. The 7-type HPV mRNA E6/E7 test demonstrated equivalent sensitivity but significantly higher specificity (77.0%) and PPV for CIN3+ detection compared to the 14-type HPV DNA test (specificity: 45.8%, < 0.001). The use of the HPV mRNA test as a triage tool reduced the number of colposcopies needed per CIN3+ case detected from 16.6 to 7.6 ( < 0.001). Self-sampling was highly accepted among participants, with the majority reporting confidence in performing the procedure, minimal discomfort, and willingness to undertake self-sampling at home. Self-sampling combined with the 7-type HPV mRNA E6/E7 testing offers a promising strategy to enhance cervical cancer screening by improving accessibility and ensuring precise diagnostics. Implementing these app roaches could lead to a significant reduction in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality, especially in underserved populations. Future research should focus on the long-term impact of integrating these methods into national screening programs and explore the cost-effectiveness of widespread implementation.

Citing Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Cytology in a Primary hrHPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.

Olthof E, Kaljouw S, van Kemenade F, Uyterlinde A, de Kok I Cancer Med. 2024; 13(19):e70299.

PMID: 39400537 PMC: 11472647. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70299.

References
1.
Derbie A, Mekonnen D, Woldeamanuel Y, Van Ostade X, Abebe T . HPV E6/E7 mRNA test for the detection of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+): a systematic review. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020; 15:9. PMC: 7006188. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-020-0278-x. View

2.
Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry K, Meijer C, Hoyer H, Ratnam S . Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006; 119(5):1095-101. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21955. View

3.
Giorgi Rossi P, Fortunato C, Barbarino P, Boveri S, Caroli S, Del Mistro A . Self-sampling to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: an RCT comparing home mailing, distribution in pharmacies, and recall letter. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112(4):667-75. PMC: 4333501. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.11. View

4.
Lazcano-Ponce E, Castro R, Allen B, Najera P, Alonso de Ruiz P, Hernandez-Avila M . Barriers to early detection of cervical-uterine cancer in Mexico. J Womens Health. 1999; 8(3):399-408. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1999.8.399. View

5.
Cuzick J, Wheeler C . Need for expanded HPV genotyping for cervical screening. Papillomavirus Res. 2017; 2:112-115. PMC: 5886893. DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2016.05.004. View