» Articles » PMID: 39001400

Prognostic Role of CA-125 Elimination Rate Constant (KELIM) in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Who Received PARP Inhibitors

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 13
PMID 39001400
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) in EOC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by PARP inhibitors, in either upfront or interval treatment settings.

Methods: Between July 2019 and November 2022, we identified stage III-IV EOC patients who underwent primary or interval cytoreductive surgery and received olaparib or niraparib. Individual KELIM values were assessed based on validated kinetics and classified into favorable and unfavorable cohorts.

Results: In a study of 252 patients undergoing frontline maintenance therapy with olaparib or niraparib, favorable KELIM (≥1) scores were associated with a higher PFS benefit in the primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) cohort (hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.37-8.97, = 0.009). Additionally, within the interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) cohort, a favorable KELIM score (≥1) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving complete resection following cytoreductive surgery, with 59.4% in the favorable KELIM group compared to 37.8% in those with unfavorable KELIM.

Conclusions: A favorable KELIM score was associated with improved PFS in patients with advanced EOC undergoing PCS. Furthermore, in the ICS cohort, a favorable KELIM score increased the probability of complete cytoreduction.

References
1.
Wang Y, Bernhardy A, Cruz C, Krais J, Nacson J, Nicolas E . The BRCA1-Δ11q Alternative Splice Isoform Bypasses Germline Mutations and Promotes Therapeutic Resistance to PARP Inhibition and Cisplatin. Cancer Res. 2016; 76(9):2778-90. PMC: 4874568. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0186. View

2.
You B, Sehgal V, Hosmane B, Huang X, Ansell P, Dinh M . CA-125 KELIM as a Potential Complementary Tool for Predicting Veliparib Benefit: An Exploratory Analysis From the VELIA/GOG-3005 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 41(1):107-116. PMC: 9788978. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00430. View

3.
Kristeleit R, Drew Y, Oza A, Domchek S, Banerjee S, Glasspool R . Efficacy and safety of rucaparib treatment in patients with BRCA-mutated, relapsed ovarian cancer: final results from Study 10. Br J Cancer. 2022; 128(2):255-265. PMC: 9902459. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02022-y. View

4.
Swisher E, Kwan T, Oza A, Tinker A, Ray-Coquard I, Oaknin A . Molecular and clinical determinants of response and resistance to rucaparib for recurrent ovarian cancer treatment in ARIEL2 (Parts 1 and 2). Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2487. PMC: 8093258. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22582-6. View

5.
Colomban O, Tod M, Peron J, Perren T, Leary A, Cook A . Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancers: Best Candidates Among High-Risk Disease Patients (ICON-7). JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020; 4(3):pkaa026. PMC: 7306189. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa026. View