6.
Sun Y, Xiong Z, Xiang X, Liu S, Zhou W, Tu X
. Whole-genome sequence of the Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri and the comparative evolution of tetrapod genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(11):E1257-62.
PMC: 4371989.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501764112.
View
7.
Malcom J, Kudra R, Malone J
. The sex chromosomes of frogs: variability and tolerance offer clues to genome evolution and function. J Genomics. 2014; 2:68-76.
PMC: 4091447.
DOI: 10.7150/jgen.8044.
View
8.
Brelsford A, Stock M, Betto-Colliard C, Dubey S, Dufresnes C, Jourdan-Pineau H
. Homologous sex chromosomes in three deeply divergent anuran species. Evolution. 2013; 67(8):2434-40.
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12151.
View
9.
Wright D, Richards C
. Two sex-linked loci in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. Genetics. 1983; 103(2):249-61.
PMC: 1219977.
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/103.2.249.
View
10.
Yoshimoto S, Okada E, Umemoto H, Tamura K, Uno Y, Nishida-Umehara C
. A W-linked DM-domain gene, DM-W, participates in primary ovary development in Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(7):2469-74.
PMC: 2268160.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712244105.
View
11.
Bachtrog D, Mank J, Peichel C, Kirkpatrick M, Otto S, Ashman T
. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?. PLoS Biol. 2014; 12(7):e1001899.
PMC: 4077654.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001899.
View
12.
Miura I, Ohtani H, Nakamura M, Ichikawa Y, Saitoh K
. The origin and differentiation of the heteromorphic sex chromosomes Z, W, X, and Y in the frog Rana rugosa, inferred from the sequences of a sex-linked gene, ADP/ATP translocase. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15(12):1612-9.
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025889.
View
13.
Wilkins A
. Moving up the hierarchy: a hypothesis on the evolution of a genetic sex determination pathway. Bioessays. 1995; 17(1):71-7.
DOI: 10.1002/bies.950170113.
View
14.
Miura I
. An evolutionary witness: the frog rana rugosa underwent change of heterogametic sex from XY male to ZW female. Sex Dev. 2008; 1(6):323-31.
DOI: 10.1159/000111764.
View
15.
Sumida M, Nishioka1 M
. Sex-linked genes and linkage maps in amphibians. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2000; 126(2):257-70.
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0491(00)00204-2.
View
16.
Volff J, Nanda I, Schmid M, Schartl M
. Governing sex determination in fish: regulatory putsches and ephemeral dictators. Sex Dev. 2008; 1(2):85-99.
DOI: 10.1159/000100030.
View
17.
Marshall Graves J, Peichel C
. Are homologies in vertebrate sex determination due to shared ancestry or to limited options?. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(4):205.
PMC: 2884537.
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-205.
View
18.
Palomar G, Ahmad F, Vasemagi A, Matsuba C, Nicieza A, Cano J
. Comparative High-Density Linkage Mapping Reveals Conserved Genome Structure but Variation in Levels of Heterochiasmy and Location of Recombination Cold Spots in the Common Frog. G3 (Bethesda). 2017; 7(2):637-645.
PMC: 5295608.
DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.036459.
View
19.
Charlesworth D, Mank J
. The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals. Genetics. 2010; 186(1):9-31.
PMC: 2940314.
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.117697.
View
20.
Toups M, Rodrigues N, Perrin N, Kirkpatrick M
. A reciprocal translocation radically reshapes sex-linked inheritance in the common frog. Mol Ecol. 2018; 28(8):1877-1889.
PMC: 7558804.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14990.
View