» Articles » PMID: 38997758

Selective Depletion of Campylobacter Jejuni Via T6SS Dependent Functionality: an Approach for Improving Chickens Gut Health

Overview
Journal Gut Pathog
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Jul 12
PMID 38997758
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The targeted depletion of potential gut pathogens is often challenging because of their intrinsic ability to thrive in harsh gut environments. Earlier, we showed that Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) exclusively uses the Type-VI Secretion System (T6SS) to target its prey such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), and phenotypic differences between T6SS-negative and T6SS-positive C. jejuni isolates toward bile salt sensitivity. However, it remains unclear how the target-driven T6SS functionality prevails in a polymicrobial gut environment. Here, we investigated the fate of microbial competition in an altered gut environment via bacterial T6SS using a T6SS-negative and -positive C. jejuni or its isogenic mutant of the hemolysin-coregulated protein (hcp). We showed that in the presence of bile salt and prey bacteria (E. coli), T6SS-positive C. jejuni experiences enhanced intracellular stress leading to cell death. Intracellular tracking of fluorophore-conjugated bile salts confirmed that T6SS-mediated bile salt influx into C. jejuni can enhance intracellular oxidative stress, affecting C. jejuni viability. We further investigated whether the T6SS activity in the presence of prey (E. coli) perturbs the in vivo colonization of C. jejuni. Using chickens as primary hosts of C. jejuni and non-pathogenic E. coli as prey, we showed a marked reduction of C. jejuni load in chickens cecum when bile salt solution was administered orally. Analysis of local antibody responses and pro-inflammatory gene expression showed a reduced risk of tissue damage, indicating that T6SS activity in the complex gut environment can be exploited as a possible measure to clear the persistent colonization of C. jejuni in chickens.

References
1.
Rossi D, Dumont C, Santos A, Vaz M, Prado R, Monteiro G . Antibiotic Resistance in the Alternative Lifestyles of . Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:535757. PMC: 8155616. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.535757. View

2.
McKenna A, Zeeshan Ijaz U, Kelly C, Linton M, Sloan W, Green B . Impact of industrial production system parameters on chicken microbiomes: mechanisms to improve performance and reduce Campylobacter. Microbiome. 2020; 8(1):128. PMC: 7488076. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00908-8. View

3.
van Vliet A, Wooldridge K, Ketley J . Iron-responsive gene regulation in a campylobacter jejuni fur mutant. J Bacteriol. 1998; 180(20):5291-8. PMC: 107575. DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.20.5291-5298.1998. View

4.
Francino M . Antibiotics and the Human Gut Microbiome: Dysbioses and Accumulation of Resistances. Front Microbiol. 2016; 6:1543. PMC: 4709861. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01543. View

5.
Skarp C, Hanninen M, Rautelin H . Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015; 22(2):103-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019. View