Downstream Emergency Department and Hospital Utilization Comparably Low Following In-Person Versus Telemedicine Primary Care for High-Risk Conditions

Overview

Journal J Gen Intern Med

Publisher Springer

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Jul 12

PMID 38997530

Authors

Dana R Sax

Mamata V Kene

Jie Huang

Anjali Gopalan

Mary E Reed

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine use expanded greatly during the COVID-19 pandemic. More data is needed to understand how this shift may impact other venues of acute care delivery.

Objective: We evaluate the association of visit modality (telephone, video, or office) and downstream emergency department (ED) and hospital visits among primary care visits for acute, time-sensitive conditions.

Design: Observational study of patient-scheduled primary care telemedicine and office visits for acute conditions (cardiac, gastrointestinal, neurologic, musculoskeletal, and head and neck) in a large, integrated healthcare delivery system.

Participants: Adults with a new self-booked primary care appointment for an eligible acute condition from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (with no primary care, ED, or hospital visits in prior 30 days).

Interventions: Visit modality, including office, video, or telephone.

Main Measures: Seven-day ED and hospital utilization, adjusted for patient and visit characteristics.

Key Results: Among 258,958 primary care visits by 239,240 adult patients, 57.7% were telemedicine visits; of these, 72.4% were telephone and 27.6% were video. Telephone visits were the timeliest, with over 70% of visits scheduled within 1 day of booking. Rates of 7-day ED utilization were low, and varied by condition group, with cardiac visits having the highest rates (4.8%) and musculoskeletal visits having the lowest (0.8%). There was less than a 1% absolute difference in ED use by visit modality for all condition types; however, telephone visits were associated with slightly higher rates than video visits. The 7-day hospitalization rate was less than 1% and observed between visit type differences varied by clinical condition.

Conclusions: Among office, telephone, and video visits in primary care for potentially high-risk, time-sensitive conditions, downstream ED and hospital use were uncommon. ED utilization was lower for video visits than telephone visits, although telephone visits were timelier and may offer a safe and accessible option for acute care.

References

Hsia R, Zagorov S, Sarkar N, Savides M, Feldmeier M, Addo N . Patterns in Patient Encounters and Emergency Department Capacity in California, 2011-2021. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2319438. PMC: 10288334. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19438. View

Venkatesh A, Janke A, Shu-Xia L, Rothenberg C, Goyal P, Terry A . Emergency Department Utilization for Emergency Conditions During COVID-19. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 78(1):84-91. PMC: 7805390. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.01.011. View

Lin M, Baker O, Richardson L, Schuur J . Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Admission Rates Among US Acute Care Hospitals. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(12):1708-1710. PMC: 6583625. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4725. View

Pines J, Hollander J . Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 51(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.008. View

Bernstein S, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U . The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 16(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x. View

Hatef E, Lans D, Bandeian S, Lasser E, Goldsack J, Weiner J . Outcomes of In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Encounters During COVID-19 Within a Large Commercially Insured Cohort. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(4):e228954. PMC: 9044109. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8954. View

Reed M, Huang J, Graetz I, Muelly E, Millman A, Lee C . Treatment and Follow-up Care Associated With Patient-Scheduled Primary Care Telemedicine and In-Person Visits in a Large Integrated Health System. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(11):e2132793. PMC: 8596201. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32793. View

Reed M, Huang J, Somers M, Hsueh L, Graetz I, Millman A . Telemedicine Versus In-Person Primary Care: Treatment and Follow-up Visits. Ann Intern Med. 2023; 176(10):1349-1357. PMC: 11382601. DOI: 10.7326/M23-1335. View

Li K, Ng S, Zhu Z, McCullough J, Kocher K, Ellimoottil C . Association Between Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Acute Care Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions During COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(3):e225484. PMC: 8972029. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5484. View

10.

McAlister F, Hsu Z, Dong Y, Tsuyuki R, van Walraven C, Bakal J . Frequency and Type of Outpatient Visits for Patients With Cardiovascular Ambulatory-Care Sensitive Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Subsequent Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(3):e027922. PMC: 9973663. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027922. View

11.

Gordon N, Lin T . The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Adult Member Health Survey. Perm J. 2016; 20(4):15-225. PMC: 5101088. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/15-225. View

12.

Reed M, Parikh R, Huang J, Ballard D, Barr I, Wargon C . Real-Time Patient-Provider Video Telemedicine Integrated with Clinical Care. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(15):1478-1479. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1805746. View

13.

Vashi A, Urech T, Carr B, Greene L, Warsavage Jr T, Hsia R . Identification of Emergency Care-Sensitive Conditions and Characteristics of Emergency Department Utilization. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(8):e198642. PMC: 6686774. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8642. View

14.

Hooker E, Mallow P, Oglesby M . Characteristics and Trends of Emergency Department Visits in the United States (2010-2014). J Emerg Med. 2019; 56(3):344-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.025. View

15.

Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H . Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32(4):1008-15. View

16.

Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris D, Coffey R . Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998; 36(1):8-27. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004. View

17.

Juergens N, Huang J, Gopalan A, Muelly E, Reed M . The association between video or telephone telemedicine visit type and orders in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):302. PMC: 9675192. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02040-z. View

18.

OShea A, Mulligan K, Carlson P, Haraldsson B, Augustine M, Kaboli P . Healthcare Utilization Differences Among Primary Care Patients Using Telemedicine in the Veterans Health Administration: a Retrospective Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(Suppl 1):109-117. PMC: 10937860. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08472-1. View

19.

Lapointe-Shaw L, Salahub C, Austin P, Bai L, Bhatia R, Bird C . Virtual Visits With Own Family Physician vs Outside Family Physician and Emergency Department Use. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(12):e2349452. PMC: 10753397. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49452. View

20.

van Walraven C, Oake N, Jennings A, Forster A . The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16(5):947-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x. View