» Articles » PMID: 38995327

Novel Physiologic Predictors of Positive Airway Pressure Effectiveness (NICEPAP) Study: Rationale, Design and Methods

Overview
Journal Sleep Breath
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Jul 12
PMID 38995327
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however the effectiveness of CPAP remains suboptimal. We describe the Novel PhysIologiC prEdictors of Positive Airway Pressure Effectiveness (NICEPAP) study. Its purpose is to determine whether physiological traits of OSA contribute to CPAP effectiveness.

Methods: NICEPAP (NCT05067088) is a prospective, observational cohort study conducted at an academic sleep center. Adults newly diagnosed with OSA (n = 267) are assessed for OSA traits of loop gain, arousal threshold, pharyngeal collapsibility, and muscle compensation from baseline polysomnography. We perform a comprehensive assessment of covariates relevant to CPAP adherence, efficacy, and patient-centered outcomes. Participants are followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes include (1) CPAP adherence (hours/night), (2) CPAP efficacy (apneas-hypopneas/hour), and (3) quality of life at six months measured by objective CPAP data and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include sleep quality, sleepiness, insomnia, and neurocognitive function.

Results: Data on covariates, including demographics, sleep symptoms, medical history, medications, sleep quality, OSA and treatment self-efficacy, decisional balance, and socio-economic and social and partner support, are collected using validated instruments. The analysis for primary outcomes includes a generalized linear mixed model for an outcome (e.g., CPAP adherence) with OSA traits as exposures followed by the addition of relevant covariates.

Conclusion: The findings of the NICEPAP study will inform research aimed to enhance CPAP effectiveness. Understanding the role of physiological OSA traits in CPAP effectiveness is a crucial step toward a precision medicine approach to OSA.

References
1.
Benjafield A, Ayas N, Eastwood P, Heinzer R, Ip M, Morrell M . Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019; 7(8):687-698. PMC: 7007763. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5. View

2.
Kendzerska T, Mollayeva T, Gershon A, Leung R, Hawker G, Tomlinson G . Untreated obstructive sleep apnea and the risk for serious long-term adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2013; 18(1):49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2013.01.003. View

3.
Mulgrew A, Al Lawati N, Ayas N, Fox N, Hamilton P, Cortes L . Residual sleep apnea on polysomnography after 3 months of CPAP therapy: clinical implications, predictors and patterns. Sleep Med. 2010; 11(2):119-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.05.017. View

4.
Crawford M, Espie C, Bartlett D, Grunstein R . Integrating psychology and medicine in CPAP adherence--new concepts?. Sleep Med Rev. 2013; 18(2):123-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2013.03.002. View

5.
Bakker J, Wang R, Weng J, Aloia M, Toth C, Morrical M . Motivational Enhancement for Increasing Adherence to CPAP: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Chest. 2016; 150(2):337-45. PMC: 4980541. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.019. View