» Articles » PMID: 38994480

Is There A Benefit of Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Prior to Radical Cystectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Overview
Journal Bladder Cancer
Publisher IOS Press
Date 2024 Jul 12
PMID 38994480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One of the best predictors of positive outcomes in bladder cancer (BC) is pT0 following radical cystectomy (RC). Discordance between clinical and pathologic staging affects decision-making in patients with clinical absence of disease (cT0).

Objectives: We sought to determine whether a restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) improves clinical staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage RC in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) versus those who did not receive NAC.

Methods: We queried our prospectively maintained IRB approved institutional database to identify 129 patients who underwent RC from 2013 to 2019 with a re-TURBT prior to RC. 53 patients were treated with NAC between their initial and re-TURBT and 76 patients were not treated with NAC.

Results: The overall upstaging rate from re-TURBT to RC was 34.9%. There was no significant difference in the upstaging rate between the NAC and no-NAC groups - 31.0% vs. 37.0%, respectively. In patients who were cT0 on re-TURBT, the NAC group did not show a significantly greater rate of pathologic clinical CR (pT0) than the no NAC group - 38.5% vs. 37.5%, respectively. Re-TURBT with staging < rT2 as a predictor for absence of MIBC on pathologic staging (<ypT2) did not show a significant difference between the NAC and no NAC group, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.0% and 66.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: Re-TURBT after NAC does not show statistically significant improvement in staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage at RC compared to re-TURBT in patients not treated with NAC.

Citing Articles

Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes.

Aydh A, Sari Motlagh R, Alamri A, Yanagisawa T, Ayed A, Rajwa P World J Urol. 2023; 41(8):2185-2194.

PMID: 37347252 PMC: 10415490. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w.

References
1.
Kukreja J, Porten S, Golla V, Ho P, Noguera-Gonzalez G, Navai N . Absence of Tumor on Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Does Not Predict Final Pathologic T0 Stage in Bladder Cancer Treated with Radical Cystectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 4(5):720-724. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.005. View

2.
Yap S, Pugashetti N, Chandrasekar T, DallEra M, Evans C, Lara P . The Promise and Disappointment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transurethral Resection for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Updated Results and Long-Term Followup. Urol Pract. 2023; 5(4):305-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.07.001. View

3.
Luo C, Huang B, Wu Y, Chen J, Chen L . Use of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for detecting the muscle invasion of bladder cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(8):4606-4614. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06802-z. View

4.
Kassouf W, Spiess P, Brown G, Munsell M, Grossman H, Siefker-Radtke A . P0 stage at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is associated with improved outcome independent of traditional clinical risk factors. Eur Urol. 2007; 52(3):769-74. PMC: 2691552. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.086. View

5.
Turker P, Bostrom P, Wroclawski M, Van Rhijn B, Kortekangas H, Kuk C . Upstaging of urothelial cancer at the time of radical cystectomy: factors associated with upstaging and its effect on outcome. BJU Int. 2012; 110(6):804-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10939.x. View