» Articles » PMID: 38994057

Identification of Disulfidptosis-related Clusters and Construction of a Disulfidptosis-related Gene Prognostic Signature in Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Jul 12
PMID 38994057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore disulfidptosis-related clusters of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and build a reliable disulfidptosis-related gene signature for forecasting TNBC prognosis.

Methods: The disulfidptosis-related clusters of TNBC were identified based on public datasets, and a comparative analysis was conducted to assess their differences in the overall survival (OS) and immune cell infiltration. Morever, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between clusters were recognized. Then, the prognostic DEGs were then chosen. A prognostic signature was constructed by the prognostic DEGs, followed by nomogram construction, drug sensitivity, immune correlation, immunotherapy response prediction, and cluster association analyses.

Results: Two disulfidptosis-related clusters of TNBC were identified, which had different OS and macrophage infiltration. Moreover, 235 DEGs were identified between two clusters. A prognostic signature was then constructed by five prognostic DEGs including HLA-DQA2, CCL13, GBP1, LAMP3, and SLC7A11. This signature was highly valuable in predicting prognosis. A nomogram was built by risk score and AJCC stage, which could forecast OS accurately. Moreover, patients with high-risk scores exhibited greater sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs such as lapatinib and had a lower immunotherapy response.

Conclusions: Two TNBC clusters linked to disulfidptosis were identified, with different OS and immune cell infiltration. Moreover, a five-disulfidptosis-related gene signature may be a powerful prognostic biomarker for TNBC.

References
1.
Xiao B, Liu L, Li A, Xiang C, Wang P, Li H . Identification and Verification of Immune-Related Gene Prognostic Signature Based on ssGSEA for Osteosarcoma. Front Oncol. 2021; 10:607622. PMC: 7771722. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.607622. View

2.
Chen C, Shen M, Liao H, Guo Q, Fu H, Yu J . A paclitaxel and microRNA-124 coloaded stepped cleavable nanosystem against triple negative breast cancer. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021; 19(1):55. PMC: 7905927. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00800-z. View

3.
Rizvi A, Karaesmen E, Morgan M, Preus L, Wang J, Sovic M . gwasurvivr: an R package for genome-wide survival analysis. Bioinformatics. 2018; 35(11):1968-1970. PMC: 7963072. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty920. View

4.
Rizzo A, Ricci A, Lanotte L, Lombardi L, Di Federico A, Brandi G . Immune-based combinations for metastatic triple negative breast cancer in clinical trials: current knowledge and therapeutic prospects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2021; 31(6):557-565. DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2009456. View

5.
Zhang S, Tong Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xu X, Xiao A . A novel and validated nomogram to predict overall survival for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms. J Cancer. 2019; 10(24):5944-5954. PMC: 6856574. DOI: 10.7150/jca.35785. View