The Role of Hysteroscopy in the Assessment of Fallopian Tubal Patency: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Jul 12

PMID 38993802

Authors

Marlene Hager

Johannes Ott

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Hysteroscopy has been recognized as a reliable method for the evaluation of female infertility for several years. The outpatient setting is particularly convenient, as patients do not require general anesthesia and do not have to stay overnight. In recent years, more and more articles have dealt with the role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in tubal evaluation. Twenty-four articles were included in this comprehensive review and 14 of them were also included in a meta-analysis. This review provides an overview of the different techniques of hysteroscopic tubal evaluation, with a focus on perioperative changes in cul-de-sac volume, the air bubble technique ("Parryscope" technique), the Flow technique and selective hysteroscopic pertubation with methylene blue dye (SHPMBD). In pooled analyses, SHPMBD achieved the highest sensitivity for tubal patency (91.7%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 88.8-94.0), whereas the air bubble technique revealed the highest specificity of all methods (98.4, 95% CI: 95.3-99.6). Furthermore, in a meta-analysis of all methods on the assessment of single tubes, an overall sensitivity of 87.1% and an overall specificity of 79.8% (95% CI: 76.4-82.9) could be shown. In conclusion, the techniques of hysteroscopic tubal evaluation are well-tolerated, clinically relevant, and reliable.

References

La Sala G, Sacchetti F, Dessanti L, Torrelli M . Complementary use of hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in 100 infertile patients: results and comparison of their diagnostic accuracy. Acta Eur Fertil. 1987; 18(6):369-74. View

Shen H, Lu Y, Su R, Wang K, Wang W, An J . Fertility Improvement of Hysteroscopy with Chromopertubation in the Management of Infertile Women with Hysterosalpingography Evidence of Abnormal Tubal Patency: A Prospective Comparative Study. Int J Womens Health. 2022; 14:1613-1619. PMC: 9675423. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S386746. View

Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

Parry J, Riche D, Aldred J, Isaacs J, Lutz E, Butler V . Proximal Tubal Patency Demonstrated Through Air Infusion During Flexible Office Hysteroscopy Is Predictive of Whole Tubal Patency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24(4):646-652. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.010. View

De Silva P, Stevenson H, Smith P, Clark T . A Systematic Review of the Effect of Type, Pressure, and Temperature of the Distension Medium on Pain During Office Hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(6):1148-1159.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.003. View

Promberger R, Simek I, Nouri K, Obermaier K, Kurz C, Ott J . Accuracy of Tubal Patency Assessment in Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Compared with Laparoscopy in Infertile Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 25(5):794-799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.11.020. View

Mardanian F, Rouholamin S, Nazemi M . Evaluation of Efficacy of Transvaginal Sonography with Hysteroscopy for Assessment of Tubal Patency in Infertile Women Regarding Diagnostic Laparoscopy. Adv Biomed Res. 2018; 7:101. PMC: 6036783. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_71_17. View

Shokeir T . Regarding "Accuracy of Tubal Patency Assessment during Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Compared with Laparoscopy in Infertile Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study". J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(3):542. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.024. View

Carta G, Palermo P, Pasquale C, Conte V, Pulcinella R, Necozione S . Office hysteroscopic-guided selective tubal chromopertubation: acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of this new diagnostic non-invasive technique in infertile women. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017; 21(2):106-111. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1384856. View

10.

Cholkeri-Singh A, Sasaki K . Hysteroscopy safety. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 28(4):250-4. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000289. View

11.

Lorincz J, Molnar S, Herman T, Vitale S, Jashanjeet S, Lampe R . Predictive value of bubble sign for tubal patency during office hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 253:58-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.048. View

12.

Devine K, Dolitsky S, Ludwin I, Ludwin A . Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2022; 118(1):19-28. PMC: 9348809. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.020. View

13.

Yildizhan B, Durmusoglu F, Uygur M, Erenus M . A new technique for the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency by using hysteroscopy with ultrasound compared with hysterosalpingography in infertile women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 280(4):543-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-0953-z. View

14.

Panda S, Kalpana B . The Diagnostic Value of Hysterosalpingography and Hysterolaparoscopy for Evaluating Uterine Cavity and Tubal Patency in Infertile Patients. Cureus. 2021; 13(1):e12526. PMC: 7863999. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12526. View

15.

Ott J, Hager M, Nouri K, Marschalek J, Kurz C . Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 27(1):135-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.006. View

16.

Bonavina G, Taylor H . Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:1020827. PMC: 9643365. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1020827. View

17.

Hager M, Ott J, Holzer I, Seemann R, Kurz C, Parry J . Hysteroscopic Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Randomized Comparison between the Flow and Parryscope Techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(7):1552-1557.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.014. View

18.

Rotshenker-Olshinka K, Volodarsky-Perel A, Steiner N, Arab S, Rubenfeld E, Mills G . Transvaginal Sonography Post-Office Hysteroscopy as a Screening Tool for Tubal Patency: A Reliable and Feasible Technique in an Outpatient Setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021; 43(8):978-983. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.05.007. View

19.

Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P . Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(4):758-769. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex013. View

20.

Hager M, Ott J, Gobl C, Holzer I, Seemann R, Kurz C . Detection of hysteroscopic fluid in the pouch of Douglas: a prospective cohort study about the predictability of bilateral tubal occlusion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 304(4):1073-1080. PMC: 8429386. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-05993-0. View