Optimizing Anaerobic Digestion: Benefits of Mild Temperature Transition from Thermophilic to Mesophilic Conditions

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Ecotechnol

Date 2024 Jul 12

PMID 38993655

Authors

Xingxing Zhang

Pengbo Jiao

Yiwei Wang

Yinying Dai

Ming Zhang

Peng Wu

Liping Ma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) plays a significant role in renewable energy recovery. Upgrading AD from thermophilic (50-57 °C) to mesophilic (30-38 °C) conditions to enhance process stability and reduce energy input remains challenging due to the high sensitivity of thermophilic microbiomes to temperature fluctuations. Here we compare the effects of two decreasing-temperature modes from 55 to 35 °C on cell viability, microbial dynamics, and interspecies interactions. A sharp transition (ST) is a one-step transition by 20 °C d, while a mild transition (MT) is a stepwise transition by 1 °C d. We find a greater decrease in methane production with ST (88.8%) compared to MT (38.9%) during the transition period. ST mode overproduced reactive oxygen species by 1.6-fold, increased membrane permeability by 2.2-fold, and downregulated microbial energy metabolism by 25.1%, leading to increased apoptosis of anaerobes by 1.9-fold and release of intracellular substances by 2.9-fold, further constraining methanogenesis. The higher (1.6 vs. 1.1 copies per A) metabolic activity of acetate-dependent methanogenesis implied more efficient methane production in a steady mesophilic, MT-mediated system. Metagenomic binning and network analyses indicated that ST induced dysbiosis in keystone species and greatly enhanced microbial functional redundancy, causing loss of microbial syntrophic interactions and redundant metabolic pathways. In contrast, the greater microbial interconnections (average degrees 44.9 vs. 22.1) in MT at a steady mesophilic state suggested that MT could better maintain necessary system functionality and stability through microbial syntrophy or specialized pathways. Adopting MT to transform thermophilic digesters into mesophilic digesters is feasible and could potentially enhance the further optimization and broader application of practical anaerobic engineering.

Citing Articles

Limosilactobacillus Regulating Microbial Communities to Overcome the Hydrolysis Bottleneck with Efficient One-Step Co-Production of H and CH.

Wu H, Zhang H, Yan R, Li S, Guo X, Qiu L Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(43):e2406119.

PMID: 39264245 PMC: 11578306. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202406119.

References

Zhang W, Li L, Xing W, Chen B, Zhang L, Li A . Dynamic behaviors of batch anaerobic systems of food waste for methane production under different organic loads, substrate to inoculum ratios and initial pH. J Biosci Bioeng. 2019; 128(6):733-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.05.013. View

Jang H, Ha J, Kim M, Kim J, Kim Y, Park J . Effect of increased load of high-strength food wastewater in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge on bacterial community structure. Water Res. 2016; 99:140-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.051. View

Li Y, Li X, Wang P, Su Y, Xie B . Size-dependent effects of polystyrene microplastics on anaerobic digestion performance of food waste: Focusing on oxidative stress, microbial community, key metabolic functions. J Hazard Mater. 2022; 438:129493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129493. View

Kim J, Lee C . Response of a continuous anaerobic digester to temperature transitions: A critical range for restructuring the microbial community structure and function. Water Res. 2015; 89:241-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.060. View

Garcia F, Clegg T, ONeill D, Warfield R, Pawar S, Yvon-Durocher G . The temperature dependence of microbial community respiration is amplified by changes in species interactions. Nat Microbiol. 2023; 8(2):272-283. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01283-w. View

Wei W, Zhang Y, Huang Q, Ni B . Polyethylene terephthalate microplastics affect hydrogen production from alkaline anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge through altering viability and activity of anaerobic microorganisms. Water Res. 2019; 163:114881. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114881. View

Evans P, Boyd J, Leu A, Woodcroft B, Parks D, Hugenholtz P . An evolving view of methane metabolism in the Archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019; 17(4):219-232. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-018-0136-7. View

Dai X, Li X, Zhang D, Chen Y, Dai L . Simultaneous enhancement of methane production and methane content in biogas from waste activated sludge and perennial ryegrass anaerobic co-digestion: The effects of pH and C/N ratio. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 216:323-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.100. View

Zhang X, Wang Y, Jiao P, Zhang M, Deng Y, Jiang C . Microbiome-functionality in anaerobic digesters: A critical review. Water Res. 2023; 249:120891. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120891. View

10.

Chen Y, Ping Q, Li D, Dai X, Li Y . Comprehensive insights into the impact of pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of waste active sludge from perspectives of organic matter composition, thermodynamics, and multi-omics. Water Res. 2022; 226:119240. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119240. View

11.

Tian Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, Chi Y, Yang M . Rapid establishment of thermophilic anaerobic microbial community during the one-step startup of thermophilic anaerobic digestion from a mesophilic digester. Water Res. 2014; 69:9-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.001. View

12.

Lv Z, Lyu P, Li K, Song F, Zhang Z, Yang Y . High temperature shock threatens methane production via disturbing microbial interactions in anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 846:157459. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157459. View

13.

Kreft J, Griffin B, Gonzalez-Cabaleiro R . Evolutionary causes and consequences of metabolic division of labour: why anaerobes do and aerobes don't. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019; 62:80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.08.008. View

14.

Li J, Ran X, Zhou M, Wang K, Wang H, Wang Y . Oxidative stress and antioxidant mechanisms of obligate anaerobes involved in biological waste treatment processes: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 838(Pt 3):156454. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156454. View

15.

Wang J, Ma D, Feng K, Lou Y, Zhou H, Liu B . Polystyrene nanoplastics shape microbiome and functional metabolism in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2022; 219:118606. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118606. View

16.

Li G, Huang B, Cheng Y, Ma W, Li S, Gong B . Determination of the response characteristics of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bioreactor disturbed by temperature change with the spectral fingerprint. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 719:137513. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137513. View

17.

Campanaro S, Treu L, Kougias P, Luo G, Angelidaki I . Metagenomic binning reveals the functional roles of core abundant microorganisms in twelve full-scale biogas plants. Water Res. 2018; 140:123-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.043. View

18.

Coelho N, Droste R, Kennedy K . Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge. Water Res. 2011; 45(9):2822-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.032. View

19.

Du M, Liu X, Wang D, Yang Q, Duan A, Chen H . Understanding the fate and impact of capsaicin in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. Water Res. 2020; 188:116539. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116539. View

20.

Liu X, Lu Q, Du M, Xu Q, Wang D . Hormesis-Like Effects of Tetrabromobisphenol A on Anaerobic Digestion: Responses of Metabolic Activity and Microbial Community. Environ Sci Technol. 2022; 56(16):11277-11287. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00062. View