The Positive Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine and Opposite-sex Social Contact: Roles of Biological Sex and Estrus

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2024 Jul 11

PMID 38992255

Authors

Mark A Smith

Samantha P Armas

Jacob D Camp

Hannah N Carlson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: Preclinical studies report that drug use and social contact mutually influence the reinforcing effects of one another. Most of these studies have used same-sex dyads exclusively, and the role of factors related to biological sex and hormonal fluctuations are not well understood.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the reinforcing effects of cocaine and social contact with an opposite-sex partner in male and female rats, and how these effects are modulated by ovarian hormones.

Methods: Male and female rats were trained in a nonexclusive choice procedure in which cocaine and social contact with an opposite-sex partner were simultaneously available on concurrent progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. To examine the effects of ovarian hormones related to estrous cycling, Experiment 1 used naturally cycling, gonadally intact females, whereas Experiment 2 used ovariectomized females, and estrus was artificially induced with exogenous hormones.

Results: In both experiments, cocaine and social contact functioned as robust reinforcers, and there were no significant effects of biological sex or estrus status of the females. The positive reinforcing effects of both cocaine and social contact increased as a function of cocaine dose, indicating that contingent cocaine administration increases the reinforcing effects of social contact.

Conclusions: These data suggest that cocaine use among opposite-sex partners may enhance factors that contribute to social bonding.

References

Witcher J, Freeman M . The proestrous surge of prolactin enhances sexual receptivity in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1985; 32(4):834-9. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod32.4.834. View

Schinke S, Fang L, Cole K . Substance use among early adolescent girls: risk and protective factors. J Adolesc Health. 2008; 43(2):191-4. PMC: 2517143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.12.014. View

Lacy R, Schorsch H, Austin B . Adolescent d-amphetamine exposure enhances the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(1):18-28. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000164. View

Aragona B, Liu Y, Curtis J, Stephan F, Wang Z . A critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(8):3483-90. PMC: 6742315. View

Goldman J, Murr A, Cooper R . The rodent estrous cycle: characterization of vaginal cytology and its utility in toxicological studies. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2007; 80(2):84-97. DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20106. View

Tenk C, Wilson H, Zhang Q, Pitchers K, Coolen L . Sexual reward in male rats: effects of sexual experience on conditioned place preferences associated with ejaculation and intromissions. Horm Behav. 2008; 55(1):93-7. PMC: 2659494. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.012. View

Smith M, Camp J, Johansen A, Strickland J . Response-contingent cocaine increases the reinforcing effectiveness of social contact. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023; 32(3):255-262. PMC: 10937325. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000679. View

Fernandez Espejo E . Prefrontocortical dopamine loss in rats delays long-term extinction of contextual conditioned fear, and reduces social interaction without affecting short-term social interaction memory. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003; 28(3):490-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300066. View

Peitz G, Strickland J, Pitts E, Foley M, Tonidandel S, Smith M . Peer influences on drug self-administration: an econometric analysis in socially housed rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2013; 24(2):114-23. PMC: 3749306. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32835f1719. View

10.

Achterberg E, Trezza V, Siviy S, Schrama L, Schoffelmeer A, Vanderschuren L . Amphetamine and cocaine suppress social play behavior in rats through distinct mechanisms. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013; 231(8):1503-15. PMC: 3962711. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3272-9. View

11.

Smith M, Pitts E . Social preference and drug self-administration: a preclinical model of social choice within peer groups. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013; 135:140-5. PMC: 3931128. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.001. View

12.

Venniro M, Zhang M, Caprioli D, Hoots J, Golden S, Heins C . Volitional social interaction prevents drug addiction in rat models. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(11):1520-1529. PMC: 7386559. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0246-6. View

13.

Schuler M, Tucker J, Pedersen E, DAmico E . Relative influence of perceived peer and family substance use on adolescent alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use across middle and high school. Addict Behav. 2018; 88:99-105. PMC: 6314679. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.025. View

14.

Bredewold R, Nascimento N, Ro G, Cieslewski S, Reppucci C, Veenema A . Involvement of dopamine, but not norepinephrine, in the sex-specific regulation of juvenile socially rewarding behavior by vasopressin. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(10):2109-2117. PMC: 6098123. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-018-0100-2. View

15.

Hubscher C, Brooks D, Johnson J . A quantitative method for assessing stages of the rat estrous cycle. Biotech Histochem. 2005; 80(2):79-87. DOI: 10.1080/10520290500138422. View

16.

Sieving R, Perry C, Williams C . Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents' alcohol use. J Adolesc Health. 2000; 26(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00056-7. View

17.

Bardo M, Neisewander J, Kelly T . Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs. Pharmacol Rev. 2013; 65(1):255-90. PMC: 3565917. DOI: 10.1124/pr.111.005124. View

18.

Engi S, Beebe E, Ayvazian V, Cruz F, Cheer J, Wenzel J . Cocaine-induced increases in motivation require 2-arachidonoylglycerol mobilization and CB1 receptor activation in the ventral tegmental area. Neuropharmacology. 2021; 193:108625. PMC: 8312311. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108625. View

19.

Chow J, Beacher N, Chabot J, Oke M, Venniro M, Lin D . Characterization of operant social interaction in rats: effects of access duration, effort, peer familiarity, housing conditions, and choice between social interaction vs. food or remifentanil. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022; 239(7):2093-2108. PMC: 10724845. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-022-06064-1. View

20.

Trainor B . Stress responses and the mesolimbic dopamine system: social contexts and sex differences. Horm Behav. 2011; 60(5):457-69. PMC: 3217312. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.08.013. View