» Articles » PMID: 38992051

Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Differences in the Conformational Stability of FtsZs Derived from Staphylococcus Aureus and Bacillus Subtilis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jul 11
PMID 38992051
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

FtsZ is highly conserved among bacteria and plays an essential role in bacterial cell division. The tense conformation of FtsZ bound to GTP assembles into a straight filament via head-to-tail associations, and then the upper subunit of FtsZ hydrolyzes GTP bound to the lower FtsZ subunit. The subunit with GDP bound disassembles accompanied by a conformational change in the subunit from the tense to relaxed conformation. Although crystal structures of FtsZ derived from several bacterial species have been determined, the conformational change from the relaxed to tense conformation has only been observed in Staphylococcus aureus FtsZ (SaFtsZ). Recent cryo-electron microscopy analyses revealed the three-dimensional reconstruction of the protofilament, in which tense molecules assemble via head-to-tail associations. However, the lower resolution of the protofilament suggested that the flexibility of the FtsZ protomers between the relaxed and tense conformations caused them to form in less-strict alignments. Furthermore, this flexibility may also prevent FtsZs other than SaFtsZ from crystalizing in the tense conformation, suggesting that the flexibility of bacterial FtsZs differs. In this study, molecular dynamics simulations were performed using SaFtsZ and Bacillus subtilis FtsZ in several situations, which suggested that different features of the FtsZs affect their conformational stability.

References
1.
Huecas S, Araujo-Bazan L, Ruiz F, Ruiz-Avila L, Martinez R, Escobar-Pena A . Targeting the FtsZ Allosteric Binding Site with a Novel Fluorescence Polarization Screen, Cytological and Structural Approaches for Antibacterial Discovery. J Med Chem. 2021; 64(9):5730-5745. PMC: 8478281. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02207. View

2.
Fujita J, Sugiyama S, Terakado H, Miyazaki M, Ozawa M, Ueda N . Dynamic Assembly/Disassembly of FtsZ Visualized by High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(4). PMC: 7914567. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041697. View

3.
Fujita J, Maeda Y, Mizohata E, Inoue T, Kaul M, Parhi A . Structural Flexibility of an Inhibitor Overcomes Drug Resistance Mutations in Staphylococcus aureus FtsZ. ACS Chem Biol. 2017; 12(7):1947-1955. PMC: 5705026. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00323. View

4.
Heo L, Feig M . Multi-state modeling of G-protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy. Proteins. 2022; 90(11):1873-1885. PMC: 9561049. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26382. View

5.
Haydon D, Stokes N, Ure R, Galbraith G, Bennett J, Brown D . An inhibitor of FtsZ with potent and selective anti-staphylococcal activity. Science. 2008; 321(5896):1673-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1159961. View