» Articles » PMID: 38991667

Shared Decision-making in the Management of Pulmonary Nodules: a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 11
PMID 38991667
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of pulmonary nodules.

Design: Systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Data Source: Studies published in English or Chinese up to April 2022 were extracted from nine databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed Data.

Eligibility Criteria: Studies were eligible if patients or healthcare providers are faced with pulmonary nodule management options or the interventions or experiences were focused on the patient-healthcare provider relationship or health education to make, increase or support shared decisions. All types of studies were included, including quantitative and qualitative studies. Grey literature and literature that had not been peer reviewed were excluded. Poster abstracts and non-empirical publications such as editorials, letters, opinion papers and review articles were excluded.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools, and extracted data from included studies. Thematic syntheses were used to identify prominent themes emerging from the data.

Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were conducted in USA. These included six qualitative studies and six quantitative studies (including both survey and quasi-experimental designs). Three major themes with specific subthemes emerged: (1) Opportunity (uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules, willingness to participate in decision-making); (2) Ability (patient's lack of knowledge, physician's experience); and (3) Different worldview (misconception, distress among patients, preference for diagnosis and treatment).

Conclusions: Uncertainty in the management of pulmonary nodules is the opportunity to implement SDM. Patients' lack of knowledge, distress, and misunderstandings between healthcare providers and patients are both the main obstacles and the causes of the application of SDM.

Citing Articles

Quantitative analysis of imaging characteristics in lung adenocarcinoma in situ using artificial intelligence.

Shi W, Hu Y, Yang Y, Song Y, Chang G, Qian H Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(35):2500-2508.

PMID: 39478305 PMC: 11646688. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15447.

References
1.
Slatore C, Wiener R, Laing A . What is a Lung Nodule?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193(7):P11-2. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.1937P11. View

2.
Golden S, Wiener R, Sullivan D, Ganzini L, Slatore C . Primary Care Providers and a System Problem: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Caring for Patients With Incidental Pulmonary Nodules. Chest. 2015; 148(6):1422-1429. PMC: 4665737. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-2938. View

3.
Iaccarino J, Simmons J, Gould M, Slatore C, Woloshin S, Schwartz L . Clinical Equipoise and Shared Decision-making in Pulmonary Nodule Management. A Survey of American Thoracic Society Clinicians. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14(6):968-975. PMC: 5566306. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-727OC. View

4.
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A . Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(10):1435-43. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312452938. View

5.
Wang M, Loh E, Chou J, Sung P, Chou Y, Lin Y . Influence of Shared Decision Making on Decisional Conflict and Regret in Postpartum Mother-Infant Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Value Health. 2021; 24(9):1335-1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.011. View