Effects of a Passive Upper-body Exoskeleton on Whole-body Kinematics, Leg Muscle Activity, and Discomfort During a Carrying Task

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Jul 11

PMID 38990910

Authors

Gabriela Garcia

Paul Gonzalo Arauz

Isabel Alvarez

Nicolas Encalada

Shirley Vega

Marco Baldo

Bernard J Martin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare whole-body kinematics, leg muscle activity, and discomfort while performing a 10-min carrying task with and without a passive upper-body exoskeleton (CarrySuitⓇ), for both males and females.

Background: Diverse commercial passive exoskeletons have appeared on the market claiming to assist lifting or carrying task. However, evidence of their impact on kinematics, muscle activity, and discomfort while performing these tasks are necessary to determine their benefits and/or limitations.

Method: Sixteen females and fourteen males carried a 15kg load with and without a passive exoskeleton during 10-min over a round trip route, in two non-consecutive days. Whole-body kinematics and leg muscle activity were evaluated for each condition. In addition, leg discomfort ratings were quantified before and immediately after the task.

Results: The gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis muscle activity remained constant over the task with the exoskeleton. Without the exoskeleton a small decrease of gastrocnemius median activation was observed regardless of sex, and a small increase in static vastus lateralis activation was observed only for females. Several differences in sagittal, frontal, and transverse movements' ranges of motion were found between conditions and over the task. With the exoskeleton, ROM in the sagittal plane increased over time for the right ankle and pelvis for both sexes, and knees for males only. Thorax ROMs in the three planes were higher for females only when using the exoskeleton. Leg discomfort was lower with the exoskeleton than without.

Conclusion: The results revealed a positive impact on range of motion, leg muscle activity, and discomfort of the tested exoskeleton.

References

Kozinc Z, Baltrusch S, Houdijk H, Sarabon N . Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons. Appl Ergon. 2020; 86:103117. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103117. View

Merlo A, Bo M, Campanini I . Electrode Size and Placement for Surface EMG Bipolar Detection from the Brachioradialis Muscle: A Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(21). PMC: 8587451. DOI: 10.3390/s21217322. View

Arauz P, Garcia M, Chiriboga P, Taco-Vasquez S, Klaic D, Verdesoto E . Spine and lower body symmetry during treadmill walking in healthy individuals-In-vivo 3-dimensional kinematic analysis. PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275174. PMC: 9536630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275174. View

Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G . Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987; 18(3):233-7. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. View

Garcia M, Laubli T, Martin B . Muscular and Vascular Issues Induced by Prolonged Standing With Different Work-Rest Cycles With Active or Passive Breaks. Hum Factors. 2018; 60(6):806-821. DOI: 10.1177/0018720818769261. View

Orantes-Gonzalez E, Heredia-Jimenez J, Robinson M . A kinematic comparison of gait with a backpack versus a trolley for load carriage in children. Appl Ergon. 2019; 80:28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.003. View

Arauz P, Chavez G, Reinoso V, Ruiz P, Ortiz E, Cevallos C . Influence of a passive exoskeleton on kinematics, joint moments, and self-reported ratings during a lifting task. J Biomech. 2023; 162:111886. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111886. View

Arauz P, Garcia M, Velez M, Leon C, Velez F, Martin B . Does treadmill workstation use affect user's kinematic gait symmetry?. PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261140. PMC: 8670710. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261140. View

Burden A . How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20(6):1023-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004. View

10.

Garcia M, Graf M, Laubli T . Lower limb pain among workers: a cross-sectional analysis of the fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017; 90(7):575-585. PMC: 5934451. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-017-1220-4. View

11.

Jackson J, Mathiassen S, Callaghan J, Dempsey P . Precision based guidelines for sub-maximal normalisation task selection for trunk extensor EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017; 37:41-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.07.001. View

12.

Garcia G, Arauz P, Alvarez I, Encalada N, Vega S, Martin B . Impact of a passive upper-body exoskeleton on muscle activity, heart rate and discomfort during a carrying task. PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0287588. PMC: 10289366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287588. View

13.

Grood E, Suntay W . A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983; 105(2):136-44. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138397. View

14.

Madinei S, Alemi M, Kim S, Srinivasan D, Nussbaum M . Biomechanical Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons in a Precision Manual Assembly Task: "Expected" Effects on Trunk Muscle Activity, Perceived Exertion, and Task Performance. Hum Factors. 2020; 62(3):441-457. DOI: 10.1177/0018720819890966. View

15.

dElia N, Vanetti F, Cempini M, Pasquini G, Parri A, Rabuffetti M . Physical human-robot interaction of an active pelvis orthosis: toward ergonomic assessment of wearable robots. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):29. PMC: 5391543. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0237-y. View

16.

Liew B, Morris S, Netto K . The Effect of Backpack Carriage on the Biomechanics of Walking: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis. J Appl Biomech. 2016; 32(6):614-629. DOI: 10.1123/jab.2015-0339. View

17.

da Costa B, Vieira E . Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med. 2009; 53(3):285-323. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20750. View

18.

Bastian A . Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008; 21(6):628-33. PMC: 2954436. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328315a293. View

19.

Bar M, Steinhilber B, Rieger M, Luger T . The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Ergon. 2021; 94:103385. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103385. View

20.

Sharpe S, Holt K, Saltzman E, Wagenaar R . Effects of a hip belt on transverse plane trunk coordination and stability during load carriage. J Biomech. 2008; 41(5):968-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.018. View