'Trustworthy' Systematic Reviews Can Only Result in Meaningful Conclusions if the Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials and the Certainty of Evidence Improves: an Update on the 'trustworthy' Living Systematic Review Project
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Miller B, Tirko A, Shipe J, Sumeriski O, Moran K
. The Systemic Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training: A Systematic Review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021; 16(4):978-990.
PMC: 8329318.
DOI: 10.26603/001c.25791.
View
2.
Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Edwards K, Hemming K, Howick J, Copsey B
. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2021; 25(9):1-378.
PMC: 7957459.
DOI: 10.3310/hta25090.
View
3.
Feres M, Feres M
. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. J Appl Oral Sci. 2023; 31:ed001.
PMC: 10065758.
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-ed001.
View
4.
Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J
. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008.
PMC: 5833365.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
View
5.
Riley S, Shaffer S, Flowers D, Hofbauer M, Swanson B
. Manual therapy for non-radicular cervical spine related impairments: establishing a 'Trustworthy' living systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 31(4):231-245.
PMC: 10324451.
DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2201917.
View