Programme Science Methodologies and Practices That Address "FURRIE" Challenges: Examples from the Field

Overview

Journal J Int AIDS Soc

Specialty Infectious Diseases

Date 2024 Jul 11

PMID 38988041

Authors

James R Hargreaves

Solange Baptiste

Parinita Bhattacharjee

Frances M Cowan

Michael E Herce

Krista Lauer

Izukanji Sikazwe

Elvin Geng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: "Programme science" deploys scientific methods to address questions that are a priority to support the impact of public health programmes. As such, programme science responds to the challenges of making such studies: (1) feasible to undertake, (2) useful, (3) rigorous, (4) real-world-relevant, (5) informative, and undertaken by (6) equitable partnerships. The acronym "FURRIE" is proposed to describe this set of six challenges. This paper discusses selected HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infection) programme science case studies to illustrate how programme science rises to the FURRIE challenges.

Discussion: One way in which programme science is made more feasible is through the analysis and interpretation of data collected through service delivery. For some questions, these data can be augmented through methods that reach potential clients of services who have not accessed services or been lost to follow-up. Process evaluation can enhance the usefulness of programme science by studying implementation processes, programme-client interactions and contextual factors. Ensuring rigour by limiting bias and confounding in the real-world context of programme science studies requires methodological innovation. Striving for scientific rigour can also have the unintended consequence of creating a gap between what happens in a study, and what happens in the "real-world." Community-led monitoring is one approach to grounding data collection in the real-world experience of clients. Evaluating complex, context-specific strategies to strengthen health outcomes in a way that is informative for other settings requires clear specification of the intervention packages that are planned and delivered in practice. Programme science provides a model for equitable partnership through co-leadership between programmes, researchers and the communities they serve.

Conclusions: Programme science addresses the FURRIE challenges, thereby improving programme impact and ultimately health outcomes and health equity. The adoption and adaptation of the types of novel programme science approaches showcased here should be promoted within and beyond the HIV/STI field.

Citing Articles

Lost in translation: key lessons from conducting dissemination and implementation science in Zambia.

Maritim P, Munakampe M, Nglazi M, Mweemba C, Sikombe K, Mbewe W Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):121.

PMID: 39473012 PMC: 11520656. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00663-z.

References

Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C . Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(2):e264-e275. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30526-1. View

Dutta M, Del Pilar-Labarda M, Kpokiri E, Thwaites L, Clark J . How to ensure equitable research partnerships in global health. BMJ. 2023; 381:1316. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p1316. View

Crockett M, Avery L, Blanchard J . Program science--a framework for improving global maternal, newborn, and child health. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(4):305-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.9. View

Becker M, Mishra S, Aral S, Bhattacharjee P, Lorway R, Green K . The contributions and future direction of Program Science in HIV/STI prevention. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018; 15:7. PMC: 5972407. DOI: 10.1186/s12982-018-0076-8. View

Proctor E, Powell B, McMillen J . Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:139. PMC: 3882890. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. View

Hoffmann T, Glasziou P, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014; 348:g1687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. View

Gaglio B, Phillips S, Heurtin-Roberts S, Sanchez M, Glasgow R . How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:96. PMC: 4243945. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0096-x. View

Blanchard J, Aral S . Program Science: an initiative to improve the planning, implementation and evaluation of HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention programmes. Sex Transm Infect. 2010; 87(1):2-3. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.047555. View

Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson S, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby J . A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374:n2061. PMC: 8482308. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061. View

10.

Geng E, Hargreaves J, Peterson M, Baral S . Implementation Research to Advance the Global HIV Response: Introduction to the JAIDS Supplement. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019; 82 Suppl 3:S173-S175. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002208. View

11.

Sibanda E, Neuman M, Tumushime M, Mangenah C, Hatzold K, Watadzaushe C . Community-based HIV self-testing: a cluster-randomised trial of supply-side financial incentives and time-trend analysis of linkage to antiretroviral therapy in Zimbabwe. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(Suppl 4). PMC: 8287602. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003866. View

12.

Victora C, VAUGHAN J, Barros F, Silva A, Tomasi E . Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet. 2000; 356(9235):1093-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02741-0. View

13.

Hargreaves J, Hassan S, Schellenberg J, Hayes R, Webster J, Lewis J . Five Challenges in the Design and Conduct of IS Trials for HIV Prevention and Treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019; 82 Suppl 3:S261-S270. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002192. View

14.

The Lancet . 50 years of the inverse care law. Lancet. 2021; 397(10276):767. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00505-5. View

15.

Gurnani V, Beattie T, Bhattacharjee P, Mohan H, Maddur S, Washington R . An integrated structural intervention to reduce vulnerability to HIV and sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:755. PMC: 3205062. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-755. View

16.

Odinga M, Kuria S, Muindi O, Mwakazi P, Njraini M, Melon M . HIV testing amid COVID-19: community efforts to reach men who have sex with men in three Kenyan counties. Gates Open Res. 2020; 4:117. PMC: 7477340. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13152.2. View

17.

Davey C, Boulay M, Hargreaves J . Strengthening nonrandomized studies of health communication strategies for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014; 66 Suppl 3:S271-7. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000232. View

18.

Benchimol E, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I . The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(10):e1001885. PMC: 4595218. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. View

19.

Makoni T, Kadziyanhike G, Mademutsa C, Mlambo M, Malama K . Community-led monitoring: a voice for key populations in Zimbabwe. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022; 25 Suppl 1:e25925. PMC: 9274208. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25925. View

20.

McClarty L, Bhattacharjee P, Isac S, Emmanuel F, Kioko J, Njiraini M . Key Programme Science lessons from an HIV prevention 'Learning Site' for sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. Sex Transm Infect. 2017; 94(5):346-352. PMC: 6204943. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053228. View