» Articles » PMID: 38987423

Longitudinal Analysis on Inflammatory Markers and Frailty Progression: Based on the English Longitudinal Study of Aging

Overview
Journal Eur Geriatr Med
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Jul 10
PMID 38987423
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Frailty is a common health state that is closely linked to adverse health outcomes in aging society. Although many inflammatory biomarkers have been cross-sectionally associated with frailty, knowledge on the longitudinal association is still limited. This study investigated the associations between inflammatory factors in clinical practice and frailty progression over time.

Methods: Data of 2316 participants (age 67.9 ± 6.1 years) were obtained from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 4, 6 and 8) over an 8-year follow-up. The frailty index (FI) was calculated from 52 items. Mixed-effects models and Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) models were used to analyze the associations of hsCRP, WBC and fibrinogen with frailty progression. Values of inflammatory biomarkers were log-transformed. Age, sex and gross wealth were controlled.

Results: Mixed-effects models showed that at a cross-sectional level, higher levels of hsCRP (β: 0.007, 95% CI 0.004-0.010), WBC (β: 0.021, 95% CI 0.010-0.032) and fibrinogen (β: 0.022, 95% CI 0.005-0.038) were associated with greater FI values while no significant time interaction was found. Cox-PH models showed that higher baseline levels of hsCRP (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17) and WBC (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37) were linked to a greater risk of developing frailty within 8 years.

Conclusions: We concluded that hsCRP, WBC and fibrinogen can reflect frailty status at a cross-sectional level while only hsCRP and WBC are associated with frailty progression over an 8-year period.

Citing Articles

The relationship between sleep duration and frailty: findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.

Huang L, He X, Zuo Y, Yang H, Zhang L Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1493533.

PMID: 39764189 PMC: 11701061. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1493533.

References
1.
Morley J, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G, Anker S, Bauer J, Bernabei R . Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(6):392-7. PMC: 4084863. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022. View

2.
Wilson D, Jackson T, Sapey E, Lord J . Frailty and sarcopenia: The potential role of an aged immune system. Ageing Res Rev. 2017; 36:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.006. View

3.
Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A . A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(7):738-43. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.738. View

4.
Kelaiditi E, Andrieu S, Cantet C, Vellas B, Cesari M . Frailty Index and Incident Mortality, Hospitalization, and Institutionalization in Alzheimer's Disease: Data From the ICTUS Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 71(4):543-8. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv137. View

5.
Akbaraly T, Hamer M, Ferrie J, Lowe G, Batty G, Hagger-Johnson G . Chronic inflammation as a determinant of future aging phenotypes. CMAJ. 2013; 185(16):E763-70. PMC: 3826354. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.122072. View