» Articles » PMID: 38983205

Predicting Inmate Suicidal Behavior with an Interpretable Ensemble Machine Learning Approach in Smart Prisons

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 10
PMID 38983205
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The convergence of smart technologies and predictive modelling in prisons presents an exciting opportunity to revolutionize the monitoring of inmate behaviour, allowing for the early detection of signs of distress and the effective mitigation of suicide risks. While machine learning algorithms have been extensively employed in predicting suicidal behaviour, a critical aspect that has often been overlooked is the interoperability of these models. Most of the work done on model interpretations for suicide predictions often limits itself to feature reduction and highlighting important contributing features only. To address this research gap, we used Anchor explanations for creating human-readable statements based on simple rules, which, to our knowledge, have never been used before for suicide prediction models. We also overcome the limitation of anchor explanations, which create weak rules on high-dimensionality datasets, by first reducing data features with the help of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). We further reduce data features through anchor interpretations for the final ensemble model of XGBoost and random forest. Our results indicate significant improvement when compared with state-of-the-art models, having an accuracy and precision of 98.6% and 98.9%, respectively. The F1-score for the best suicide ideation model appeared to be 96.7%.

References
1.
Edgcomb J, Shaddox T, Hellemann G, Brooks 3rd J . Predicting suicidal behavior and self-harm after general hospitalization of adults with serious mental illness. J Psychiatr Res. 2020; 136:515-521. PMC: 8009812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.024. View

2.
Lin G, Nagamine M, Yang S, Tai Y, Lin C, Sato H . Machine Learning Based Suicide Ideation Prediction for Military Personnel. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020; 24(7):1907-1916. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2988393. View

3.
Navarro M, Ouellet-Morin I, Geoffroy M, Boivin M, Tremblay R, Cote S . Machine Learning Assessment of Early Life Factors Predicting Suicide Attempt in Adolescence or Young Adulthood. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(3):e211450. PMC: 7955274. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1450. View

4.
Belle V, Papantonis I . Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning. Front Big Data. 2021; 4:688969. PMC: 8281957. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2021.688969. View

5.
Barros J, Morales S, Echavarri O, Garcia A, Ortega J, Asahi T . Suicide detection in Chile: proposing a predictive model for suicide risk in a clinical sample of patients with mood disorders. Braz J Psychiatry. 2016; 39(1):1-11. PMC: 7112738. DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1877. View