» Articles » PMID: 38982005

How to Define and Meet Blood Pressure Targets After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Neurocrit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Jul 9
PMID 38982005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a significant challenge to healthcare providers, necessitating meticulous management of hemodynamic parameters to optimize patient outcomes. This article delves into the critical task of defining and meeting continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets in the context of severe TBI in neurocritical care settings.

Methods: We narratively reviewed existing literature, clinical guidelines, and emerging technologies to propose a comprehensive approach that integrates real-time monitoring, individualized cerebral perfusion target setting, and dynamic interventions.

Results: Our findings emphasize the need for personalized hemodynamic management, considering the heterogeneity of patients with TBI and the evolving nature of their condition. We describe the latest advancements in monitoring technologies, such as autoregulation-guided ABP/CPP treatment, which enable a more nuanced understanding of cerebral perfusion dynamics. By incorporating these tools into a proactive monitoring strategy, clinicians can tailor interventions to optimize ABP/CPP and mitigate secondary brain injury.

Discussion: Challenges in this field include the lack of standardized protocols for interpreting multimodal neuromonitoring data, potential variability in clinical decision-making, understanding the role of cardiac output, and the need for specialized expertise and customized software to have individualized ABP/CPP targets regularly available. The patient outcome benefit of monitoring-guided ABP/CPP target definitions still needs to be proven in patients with TBI.

Conclusions: We recommend that the TBI community take proactive steps to translate the potential benefits of personalized ABP/CPP targets, which have been implemented in certain centers, into a standardized and clinically validated reality through randomized controlled trials.

Citing Articles

Prospective comparative clinical trials of novel non-invasive intracranial pressure pulse wave monitoring technologies: preliminary clinical data.

Putnynaite V, Chaleckas E, Deimantavicius M, Bartusis L, Hamarat Y, Petkus V Interface Focus. 2024; 14(6):20240027.

PMID: 39649450 PMC: 11620824. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2024.0027.

References
1.
Maas A, Menon D, Manley G, Abrams M, Akerlund C, Andelic N . Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21(11):1004-1060. PMC: 10427240. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. View

2.
Lazaridis C, Foreman B . Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2023; 20(6):1457-1471. PMC: 10684466. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01411-2. View

3.
de Macedo Filho L, Figueredo L, Villegas-Gomez G, Arthur M, Pedraza-Ciro M, Martins H . Pathophysiology-Based Management of Secondary Injuries and Insults in TBI. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3). PMC: 10968249. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030520. View

4.
Stocchetti N, Carbonara M, Citerio G, Ercole A, Skrifvars M, Smielewski P . Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit. Lancet Neurol. 2017; 16(6):452-464. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30118-7. View

5.
Beqiri E, Garcia-Orellana M, Politi A, Zeiler F, Placek M, Fabregas N . Cerebral autoregulation derived blood pressure targets in elective neurosurgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(3):649-662. PMC: 11164832. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-01115-0. View