The Impact of COVID-19 on the Employment of People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Multiple Methods Study

Overview

Journal Int J MS Care

Date 2024 Jul 9

PMID 38979405

Authors

Blanca De Dios Perez

Charlotte Pritchard

Katie Powers

Roshan das Nair

Nikos Evangelou

Helen Ford

Emma Tallantyre

Ruth Dobson

Kathryn Radford

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to approximately half of the working population in the United Kingdom being unable to work temporarily. This study aims to understand the employment needs and experiences of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in the UK during this period.

Methods: Multiple methods were used, including an online survey and follow-up interviews with people with MS who were employed prior to the start of the pandemic restrictions in March 2020.

Results: The online survey was completed by 101 eligible participants and we interviewed 15 of them for qualitative data in the follow-up. Survey data indicated that the work experience of people with MS improved during the pandemic because they were allowed to work from home. However, participants experienced increased feelings of anxiety and loneliness. From the interviews, we extracted 5 themes: (1) the benefits of working from home; (2) the challenges of working during the COVID-19 pandemic; (3) the relevance of managers; (4) returning to "normal"; and (5) the need for vocational support.

Conclusions: The pandemic showed that MS symptom management was improved by work flexibility (eg, working from home, breaks, flexible working hours); for people with MS, these accommodations improved both their ability to work and their self-perceived productivity. Future research should explore the support needs of people with MS who work remotely and determine whether pandemic-influenced work accommodations are sustainable over time.

References

Krause I, Kern S, Horntrich A, Ziemssen T . Employment status in multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-specific and non-disease-specific factors. Mult Scler. 2013; 19(13):1792-9. DOI: 10.1177/1352458513485655. View

Dicken S, Mitchell J, Le Vay J, Beard E, Kale D, Herbec A . Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Weight and BMI among UK Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis of Data from the HEBECO Study. Nutrients. 2021; 13(9). PMC: 8469464. DOI: 10.3390/nu13092911. View

Mohr D, Hart S, Julian L, Cox D, Pelletier D . Association between stressful life events and exacerbation in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. BMJ. 2004; 328(7442):731. PMC: 381319. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38041.724421.55. View

Kusznir Vitturi B, Rahmani A, Dini G, Montecucco A, Debarbieri N, Bandiera P . Work Barriers and Job Adjustments of People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(3):450-462. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10084-1. View

Beesley R, Cauchi M, Davies L, Upcott M, Norton E, Loveless S . Multiple sclerosis and COVID-19: Assessing risk perception, patient behaviors and access to disease-modifying therapies. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022; 68:104121. PMC: 9381979. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104121. View

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N . Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000; 320(7227):114-6. PMC: 1117368. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114. View

Sweetland J, Howse E, Playford E . A systematic review of research undertaken in vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(24):2031-8. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.669019. View

Strober L, Christodoulou C, Benedict R, Westervelt H, Melville P, Scherl W . Unemployment in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of personality and disease. Mult Scler. 2011; 18(5):647-53. DOI: 10.1177/1352458511426735. View

Michie S, van Stralen M, West R . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:42. PMC: 3096582. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42. View

10.

Povolo C, Blair M, Mehta S, Rosehart H, Morrow S . Predictors of vocational status among persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019; 36:101411. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101411. View

11.

Busche K, Fisk J, Murray T, Metz L . Short term predictors of unemployment in multiple sclerosis patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2003; 30(2):137-42. DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100053403. View

12.

Doogan C, Playford E . Supporting work for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014; 20(6):646-50. DOI: 10.1177/1352458514523499. View

13.

De Dios Perez B, Radford K, das Nair R . Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis at work: Towards the understanding of the needs for a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention. Work. 2022; 72(1):303-313. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-210012. View

14.

COLE F . Content analysis: process and application. Clin Nurse Spec. 1988; 2(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1097/00002800-198800210-00025. View

15.

Simmons R, Tribe K, McDonald E . Living with multiple sclerosis: longitudinal changes in employment and the importance of symptom management. J Neurol. 2010; 257(6):926-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5441-7. View

16.

Honarmand K, Akbar N, Kou N, Feinstein A . Predicting employment status in multiple sclerosis patients: the utility of the MS functional composite. J Neurol. 2010; 258(2):244-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-010-5736-8. View