» Articles » PMID: 38979377

Distinct Dopaminergic Spike-timing-dependent Plasticity Rules Are Suited to Different Functional Roles

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Jul 9
PMID 38979377
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various mathematical models have been formulated to describe the changes in synaptic strengths resulting from spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). A subset of these models include a third factor, dopamine, which interacts with spike timing to contribute to plasticity at specific synapses, notably those from cortex to striatum at the input layer of the basal ganglia. Theoretical work to analyze these plasticity models has largely focused on abstract issues, such as the conditions under which they may promote synchronization and the weight distributions induced by inputs with simple correlation structures, rather than on scenarios associated with specific tasks, and has generally not considered dopamine-dependent forms of STDP. In this paper we introduce three forms of dopamine-modulated STDP adapted from previously proposed plasticity rules. We then analyze, mathematically and with simulations, their performance in three biologically relevant scenarios. We test the ability of each of the three models to maintain its weights in the face of noise and to complete simple reward prediction and action selection tasks, studying the learned weight distributions and corresponding task performance in each setting. Interestingly, we find that each plasticity rule is well suited to a subset of the scenarios studied but falls short in others. Different tasks may therefore require different forms of synaptic plasticity, yielding the prediction that the precise form of the STDP mechanism present may vary across regions of the striatum, and other brain areas impacted by dopamine, that are involved in distinct computational functions.

References
1.
Grillner S, Robertson B, Stephenson-Jones M . The evolutionary origin of the vertebrate basal ganglia and its role in action selection. J Physiol. 2013; 591(22):5425-31. PMC: 3853485. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.246660. View

2.
Gerstner W, Kempter R, van Hemmen J, Wagner H . A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature. 1996; 383(6595):76-81. DOI: 10.1038/383076a0. View

3.
Riley B, Gould E, Lloyd J, Hallum L, Vlajkovic S, Todd K . Dopamine transmission in the tail striatum: Regional variation and contribution of dopamine clearance mechanisms. J Neurochem. 2024; 168(3):251-268. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.16052. View

4.
Montague P, Dayan P, Sejnowski T . A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(5):1936-47. PMC: 6578666. View

5.
Holly E, Galanaugh J, Fuccillo M . Local regulation of striatal dopamine: A diversity of circuit mechanisms for a diversity of behavioral functions?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2024; 85:102839. PMC: 11066854. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2024.102839. View