» Articles » PMID: 38979097

Enhanced Anti-bacterial Adhesion Effect of FDMA/SR833s Based Dental Resin Composites by Using 1H,1H-heptafluorobutyl Methacrylate As Partial Diluent

Overview
Date 2024 Jul 9
PMID 38979097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the purpose of further reducing surface free energy to achieve better anti-bacterial adhesion effect of fluorinated dimethacrylate (FDMA)/tricyclo (5.2.1.0) decanedimethanol diacrylate (SR833s) based dental resin composites (DS), 1H,1H-heptafluorobutyl methacrylate (FBMA) was used to partially replace SR933s as reactive diluent. According to the degree of substitution, the obtained resin composites were marked as DSF-1 (20 wt.% of SR833s was replaced by FBMA), DSF-2 (40 wt.% of SR833s was replaced by FBMA), and DSF-3 (60 wt.% of SR833s was replaced by FBMA). Bisphenol A glycidyl dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA)/triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) based resin composite (BT) was used as control. The influence of FBMA concentration on double bond conversion (DC), contact angle, surface free energy, anti-bacterial adhesion effect against (), volumetric shrinkage (VS) and shrinkage stress (SS), flexural strength (FS) and modulus (FM), water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL) were investigated. The results showed that FBMA addition could reduce surface free energy from 44.6 mN/m for DS to 32.9 mN/m for DSF-3, and lead to better anti-bacterial adhesion effect (the amounts of adherent bacteria decreased from 2.03 × 10 CFU/mm for DS to 6.44 × 10 CFU/mm for DSF-3). The FBMA had no negative effects on DC, VS, SS, WS, and SL. Too high a concentration of FBMA reduced FS and FM before water immersion, but the values were still higher than those of BT.

Citing Articles

A review of new generation of dental restorative resin composites with antibacterial, remineralizing and self-healing capabilities.

Zhang J, Yang Y, Chen Y, Chen X, Li A, Wang J Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):189.

PMID: 39570468 PMC: 11582236. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-04151-0.

References
1.
Dewaele M, Truffier-Boutry D, Devaux J, Leloup G . Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage-conversion relationship revisited. Dent Mater. 2005; 22(4):359-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.014. View

2.
Liu X, Wang Z, Zhao C, Bu W, Zhang Y, Na H . Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of a fluorinated resin monomer with low water sorption. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 77:446-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.026. View

3.
Soares C, Faria-E-Silva A, Rodrigues M, Vilela A, Pfeifer C, Tantbirojn D . Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements - What do we need to know?. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31(suppl 1):e62. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0062. View

4.
Kovalchuk N, Trybala A, Starov V, Matar O, Ivanova N . Fluoro- vs hydrocarbon surfactants: why do they differ in wetting performance?. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014; 210:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.003. View

5.
Aljabo A, Xia W, Liaqat S, Khan M, Knowles J, Ashley P . Conversion, shrinkage, water sorption, flexural strength and modulus of re-mineralizing dental composites. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(11):1279-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.149. View