» Articles » PMID: 38977707

Daratumumab in Transplant-eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Final Analysis of Clinically Relevant Subgroups in GRIFFIN

Abstract

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract.

Citing Articles

Frontline management of multiple myeloma patients: optimizing treatment for patients in the Gulf region.

Marashi M, Al Farsi K, Al Hateeti H, Alhuraiji A, Elsabah H, Cherif H Clin Hematol Int. 2025; 7(1):14-28.

PMID: 39944235 PMC: 11820852. DOI: 10.46989/001c.128113.


Daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in untreated multiple myeloma: analysis of key subgroups of the MAIA study.

Moreau P, Facon T, Usmani S, Bahlis N, Raje N, Plesner T Leukemia. 2025; 39(3):710-719.

PMID: 39815052 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02506-1.


Insights from Clinical Trials: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Induction Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma.

Lytvynova O, Jwayyed J, Pastel D, Prasad R, Khouri J, Williams L Antibodies (Basel). 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39449322 PMC: 11503272. DOI: 10.3390/antib13040080.

References
1.
Mateos M, Dimopoulos M, Cavo M, Suzuki K, Jakubowiak A, Knop S . Daratumumab plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone for Untreated Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017; 378(6):518-528. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714678. View

2.
Kinder M, Bahlis N, Malavasi F, De Goeij B, Babich A, Sendecki J . Comparison of CD38 antibodies and mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2021; 106(7):2004-2008. PMC: 8252955. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2020.268656. View

3.
Walker B, Mavrommatis K, Wardell C, Ashby T, Bauer M, Davies F . A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia. 2018; 33(1):159-170. PMC: 6326953. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0196-8. View

4.
Voorhees P, Sborov D, Laubach J, Kaufman J, Reeves B, Rodriguez C . Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023; 10(10):e825-e837. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00217-X. View

5.
Corre J, Montes L, Martin E, Perrot A, Caillot D, Leleu X . Early relapse after autologous transplant for myeloma is associated with poor survival regardless of cytogenetic risk. Haematologica. 2020; 105(9):e480-483. PMC: 7556617. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.236588. View