» Articles » PMID: 38975053

Construction of a Predictive Model of 2-3 cm Ground-glass Nodules Developing into Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma Using High-resolution CT

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jul 8
PMID 38975053
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the imaging risk factors for the development of 2-3 cm ground-glass nodules (GGN) for invasive lung adenocarcinoma and to establish a nomogram prediction model to provide a reference for the pathological prediction of 2-3 cm GGN and the selection of surgical procedures.

Methods: We reviewed the demographic, imaging, and pathological information of 596 adult patients who underwent 2-3 cm GGN resection, between 2018 and 2022, in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University. Based on single factor analysis, the regression method was used to analyze multiple factors, and a nomogram prediction model for 2-3 cm GGN was established.

Results: (1) The risk factors for the development of 2-3 cm GGN during the invasion stage of the lung adenocarcinoma were pleural depression sign (OR = 1.687, 95%CI: 1.010-2.820), vacuole (OR = 2.334, 95%CI: 1.222-4.460), burr sign (OR = 2.617, 95%CI: 1.008-6.795), lobulated sign (OR = 3.006, 95%CI: 1.098-8.227), bronchial sign (OR = 3.134, 95%CI: 1.556-6.310), diameter of GGN (OR = 3.118, 95%CI: 1.151-8.445), and CTR (OR = 172.517, 95%CI: 48.023-619.745). (2) The 2-3 cm GGN risk prediction model was developed based on the risk factors with an AUC of 0.839; the calibration curve was close to the -line, and the decision curve was drawn in the range of 0.0-1.0.

Conclusion: We analyzed the risk factors for the development of 2-3  cm GGN during the invasion stage of the lung adenocarcinoma. The predictive model developed based on the above factors had some clinical significance.

References
1.
Lee H, Goo J, Lee C, Park C, Kim K, Park E . Predictive CT findings of malignancy in ground-glass nodules on thin-section chest CT: the effects on radiologist performance. Eur Radiol. 2008; 19(3):552-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1188-2. View

2.
Han G, Liu X, Zheng G, Wang M, Huang S . Automatic recognition of 3D GGO CT imaging signs through the fusion of hybrid resampling and layer-wise fine-tuning CNNs. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018; 56(12):2201-2212. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1850-z. View

3.
Walter J, Heuvelmans M, Yousaf-Khan U, Dorrius M, Thunnissen E, Schermann A . New Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: The NELSON Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2018; 13(9):1410-1414. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.006. View

4.
Garau N, Paganelli C, Summers P, Choi W, Alam S, Lu W . External validation of radiomics-based predictive models in low-dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis. Med Phys. 2020; 47(9):4125-4136. PMC: 7708421. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14308. View

5.
Zhao Q, Wang J, Yang L, Xue L, Lu W . CT diagnosis of pleural and stromal invasion in malignant subpleural pure ground-glass nodules: an exploratory study. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(1):279-286. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5558-0. View