» Articles » PMID: 38974920

Minding Mentalizing - Convergent Validity of the Mentalization Breakdown Interview

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Jul 8
PMID 38974920
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Mentalizing difficulties are central to borderline personality disorder (BPD), have severe consequences, and are an explicit focus in mentalization-based treatment. The significance of mentalizing capacity as a predictor or mediator of change is however still uncertain due to a scarcity of research. The Mentalization Breakdown Interview (MBI) was developed as a time saving tool for studying psychotherapy processes and outcome in borderline pathology. This study aimed to investigate the convergent validity of reflective functioning (RF) ratings based on the MBI (MBI-RF) by a comparison with the gold standard, i.e., RF assessments based on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI-RF). A secondary aim was to investigate how MBI-RF relates to core symptoms of BPD, levels of functional impairment and symptom distress compared with AAI-RF.

Method: Forty-five patients with BPD or significant BPD traits were included. MBI-RF and AAI-RF were rated using the Reflective Functioning Scale. Levels of MBI-RF and AAI-RF and the correlation between the measures were calculated, as well as their associations with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Levels of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0, Work and Social Adjustment Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, self-harm, suicide attempts, and PD diagnostics.

Results: The correlation between MBI-RF and AAI-RF was 0.79 (<0.01), indicating high convergent validity. There were few significant associations between MBI-RF and AAI-RF and clinical measures.

Conclusions: The study provides support for the convergent validity of the MBI as a BPD-focused RF assessment method. The MBI has the potential as a time saving, reliable and valid method to be applied in treatment research on patients with borderline pathology. The results indicate that measures of MBI-RF and AAI-RF are different from clinical symptoms.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04157907.

References
1.
Fonagy P, Leigh T, Steele M, Steele H, Kennedy R, Mattoon G . The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996; 64(1):22-31. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.1.22. View

2.
Fonagy P, Luyten P . A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol. 2009; 21(4):1355-81. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579409990198. View

3.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

4.
Rutimann D, Meehan K . Validity of a brief interview for assessing reflective function. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2012; 60(3):577-89. DOI: 10.1177/0003065112445616. View

5.
Lowyck B, Vermote R, Luyten P, Franssen M, Verhaest Y, Vertommen H . Comparison of reflective functioning as measured on the adult attachment interview and the object relations inventory in patients with a personality disorder: a preliminary study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2010; 57(6):1469-72. DOI: 10.1177/00030651090570060803. View