Preoperative Computed Tomography-guided Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison Between Hook-wire and Anchored Needle Localization
Overview
Affiliations
Introduction: Both hook-wire (HW) and anchored needle (AN) techniques can be used for preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization for pulmonary nodules (PNs). But the outcomes associated with these two materials remain unclear.
Aim: To assess the relative safety and efficacy of preoperative CT-guided HW and AN localization for PNs.
Material And Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from two institutions. Consecutive patients with PNs between January 2020 and December 2021 who underwent preoperative CT-guided HW or AN localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures were included in these analyses, which compared the safety and clinical efficiency of these two localization strategies.
Results: In total, 98 patients (105 PNs) and 93 patients (107 PNs) underwent CT-guided HW and AN localization procedures, respectively. The HW and AN groups exhibited similar rates of successful PN localization (95.2% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.117), but the dislodgement rate in the HW group was significantly higher than that for the AN group (4.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.029). The mean pain score of patients in the HW group was significantly higher than that for the AN group (p = 0.001). HW and AN localization strategies were associated with comparable pneumothorax (21.4% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.349) and pulmonary hemorrhage (29.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.354) rates. All patients other than 1 individual in the HW group successfully underwent VATS-guided limited resection.
Conclusions: These data suggest that AN represents a safe, well-tolerated, feasible preoperative localization strategy for PNs that may offer value as a replacement for HW localization.
Preoperative computed tomography-guided soft hook-wire localization for multiple pulmonary nodules.
Li G, Wu Z, Shi Y, Wang J, Fu Y Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1501165.
PMID: 40061898 PMC: 11886374. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1501165.