» Articles » PMID: 38974311

Analysis of Oxygen Concentration in the Oral Cavity During Intravenous Sedation with Intranasal Oxygen Administration for Dental Treatment

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2024 Jul 8
PMID 38974311
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intravenous sedation (IVS) with propofol (PPF) is commonly performed in dental treatment, particular in patients with dentophobia, with gag reflex, or undergoing implant surgeries, as PPF has the advantages of rapid induction and recovery. However, PPF and other intravenous sedatives may cause respiratory depression. Thus, IVS with PPF requires oxygen administration. But airway burn may occur when high-concentration oxygen is stored in the oral cavity and catches fire. For these reasons, the present study aimed to elucidate the changes in oxygen concentration (OC) under IVS with PPF and oxygen administration.

Patients And Methods: Nineteen healthy male volunteers participated in the study. None of them had missing teeth, nasal congestion, or temporomandibular joint dysfunction. They were sedated with a continuous PPF infusion dose of 6 mg/kg/hr for 25 min, followed by administration of 3 L/min oxygen via a nasal cannula. The OC was measured at two sites, namely, the median maxillary anterior teeth (MMAT) and median maxillary soft palate (MMSP), before PPF infusion (baseline) and 14, 15-18 (Term 1), 19, and 20-23 (Term 2) min after the start of infusion.

Results: Compared with the values at baseline, the OC in the MMSP significantly increased at each time point, whereas the OC in the MMAT significantly increased at Term 2. Furthermore, in the comparison of the OC before and after the use of a mouth prop, the OC exhibited an upward trend, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the two time points in the MMAT and MMSP. In IVS with PPF and oxygen administration, the OC in the pharynx increases as the sedative level deepens.

Conclusion: Oxygen administration should be temporarily discontinued, and suction should be performed to decrease the OC in the oral cavity when sparking procedures during IVS with PPF and oxygen administration are performed.

References
1.
Hillman D, Walsh J, Maddison K, Platt P, Kirkness J, Noffsinger W . Evolution of changes in upper airway collapsibility during slow induction of anesthesia with propofol. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a7ec68. View

2.
Rafla R, Saxen M, Yepes J, Jones J, Vinson L . Comparison of Oropharyngeal Oxygen Pooling and Suctioning During Intubated and Nonintubated Dental Office-Based Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2023; 70(1):3-8. PMC: 10069532. DOI: 10.2344/anpr-70-01-02. View

3.
OReilly Nugent A, Kelly P, Stanton J, Swanney M, Graham B, Beckert L . Measurement of oxygen concentration delivered via nasal cannulae by tracheal sampling. Respirology. 2014; 19(4):538-43. DOI: 10.1111/resp.12268. View

4.
Cox B, Jones J, Saxen M, Yepes J . Preventing Dental Surgical Fires: Characterizing Nasal-Cannulated Supplemental Oxygen Pooling in an In Situ Dental Procedure. J Patient Saf. 2020; 16(4):316-319. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000677. View

5.
Weaver J . Prevention of fire in the dental chair. Anesth Prog. 2012; 59(3):105-6. PMC: 3468287. DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.105. View