Identification of a Cryptic Pocket in Methionine Aminopeptidase-II Using Adaptive Bandit Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Markov State Models

Overview

Journal ACS Omega

Publisher American Chemical Society

Specialty Chemistry

Date 2024 Jul 8

PMID 38973915

Authors

Rubina

Syed Tarique Moin

Shozeb Haider

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Methionine aminopeptidase-II (MetAP-II) is a metalloprotease, primarily responsible for the cotranslational removal of the N-terminal initiator methionine from the nascent polypeptide chain during protein synthesis. MetAP-II has been implicated in angiogenesis and endothelial cell proliferation and is therefore considered a validated target for cancer therapeutics. However, there is no effective drug available against MetAP-II. In this study, we employ Adaptive Bandit molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the structural dynamics of the apo and ligand-bound MetAP-II. Our results focus on the dynamic behavior of the disordered loop that is not resolved in most of the crystal structures. Further analysis of the conformational flexibility of the disordered loop reveals a hidden cryptic pocket that is predicted to be potentially druggable. The network analysis indicates that the disordered loop region has a direct signaling route to the active site. These findings highlight a new way to target MetAP-II by designing inhibitors for the allosteric site within this disordered loop region.

References

Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning E, Woolf T, Beckstein O . MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2011; 32(10):2319-27. PMC: 3144279. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21787. View

Kozakov D, Grove L, Hall D, Bohnuud T, Mottarella S, Luo L . The FTMap family of web servers for determining and characterizing ligand-binding hot spots of proteins. Nat Protoc. 2015; 10(5):733-55. PMC: 4762777. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.043. View

Carducci M, Wang D, Habermehl C, Bodding M, Rohdich F, Lignet F . A First-in-human, Dose-escalation Study of the Methionine Aminopeptidase 2 Inhibitor M8891 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Res Commun. 2023; 3(8):1638-1647. PMC: 10448909. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0048. View

Klein C, Schiffmann R, Folkers G, Piana S, Rothlisberger U . Protonation states of methionine aminopeptidase and their relevance for inhibitor binding and catalytic activity. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(48):47862-7. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M305325200. View

Hu X, Addlagatta A, Lu J, Matthews B, Liu J . Elucidation of the function of type 1 human methionine aminopeptidase during cell cycle progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(48):18148-53. PMC: 1838721. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608389103. View

Shukla D, Hernandez C, Weber J, Pande V . Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function. Acc Chem Res. 2015; 48(2):414-22. PMC: 4333613. DOI: 10.1021/ar5002999. View

Lowther W, Matthews B . Metalloaminopeptidases: common functional themes in disparate structural surroundings. Chem Rev. 2002; 102(12):4581-608. DOI: 10.1021/cr0101757. View

Meng Y, Shukla D, Pande V, Roux B . Transition path theory analysis of c-Src kinase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(33):9193-8. PMC: 4995974. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602790113. View

Shusterman S, Maris J . Prospects for therapeutic inhibition of neuroblastoma angiogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2005; 228(1-2):171-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.049. View

10.

Ben-Bassat A, Bauer K, Chang S, Myambo K, Boosman A, Chang S . Processing of the initiation methionine from proteins: properties of the Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase and its gene structure. J Bacteriol. 1987; 169(2):751-7. PMC: 211843. DOI: 10.1128/jb.169.2.751-757.1987. View

11.

Wang J, Wolf R, Caldwell J, Kollman P, Case D . Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25(9):1157-74. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20035. View

12.

Bradshaw R, Brickey W, Walker K . N-terminal processing: the methionine aminopeptidase and N alpha-acetyl transferase families. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998; 23(7):263-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01227-4. View

13.

Babu C, Lim C . Empirical force fields for biologically active divalent metal cations in water. J Phys Chem A. 2006; 110(2):691-9. DOI: 10.1021/jp054177x. View

14.

Mercadante D, Grater F, Daday C . CONAN: A Tool to Decode Dynamical Information from Molecular Interaction Maps. Biophys J. 2018; 114(6):1267-1273. PMC: 5883949. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.033. View

15.

Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K . VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14(1):33-8, 27-8. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. View

16.

Evdokimov A, Pokross M, Walter R, Mekel M, Barnett B, Amburgey J . Serendipitous discovery of novel bacterial methionine aminopeptidase inhibitors. Proteins. 2006; 66(3):538-46. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21207. View

17.

Pettersen E, Goddard T, Huang C, Couch G, Greenblatt D, Meng E . UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25(13):1605-12. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20084. View

18.

ARFIN S, Kendall R, Hall L, Weaver L, Stewart A, Matthews B . Eukaryotic methionyl aminopeptidases: two classes of cobalt-dependent enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92(17):7714-8. PMC: 41216. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7714. View

19.

Prinz J, Wu H, Sarich M, Keller B, Senne M, Held M . Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. J Chem Phys. 2011; 134(17):174105. DOI: 10.1063/1.3565032. View

20.

Lowther W, Orville A, Madden D, Lim S, Rich D, Matthews B . Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase: implications of crystallographic analyses of the native, mutant, and inhibited enzymes for the mechanism of catalysis. Biochemistry. 1999; 38(24):7678-88. DOI: 10.1021/bi990684r. View