» Articles » PMID: 38973796

Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Endoscopic Intervention for Treating Infected Pancreatic Necrosis. A Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Termedia
Date 2024 Jul 8
PMID 38973796
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The current study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical treatment for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Material And Methods: A meta-analysis of clinical studies on minimally invasive operations for necrotic infection was conducted. A systematic review and study inclusion were done on multiple databases. English-language prospective comparison studies were included. Random design was used to analyze research with continuous and dichotomous variables.

Results: Ten studies were included in the current study. When compared to minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic procedures showed significant beneficial outcomes regarding low post-operative complication rates (p = 0.006), new onset organ failure (p < 0.001), and pancreatic fistula (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two interventions regarding hospital stay, postoperative bleeding, incisional hernia, endocrine insufficiency, and perforation of a visceral organ.

Conclusions: Endoscopic therapy appears to have potential advantages over minimally invasive surgery. However, there is no difference between interventions regarding several parameters.

References
1.
Abdelhafez M, Elnegouly M, Hasab Allah M, Elshazli M, Mikhail H, Yosry A . Transluminal retroperitoneal endoscopic necrosectomy with the use of hydrogen peroxide and without external irrigation: a novel approach for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(10):3911-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2948-x. View

2.
Bang J, Arnoletti J, Holt B, Sutton B, Hasan M, Navaneethan U . An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2018; 156(4):1027-1040.e3. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.031. View

3.
Mohiuddin K, Swanson S . Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108(5):315-9. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23398. View

4.
Rogalski P, Daniluk J, Baniukiewicz A, Wroblewski E, Dabrowski A . Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(37):10542-52. PMC: 4588076. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10542. View

5.
Bausch D, Wellner U, Kahl S, Kuesters S, Richter-Schrag H, Utzolino S . Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy. Surgery. 2012; 152(3 Suppl 1):S128-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.021. View