» Articles » PMID: 38973044

[Study on the Consistency Between CBCT Image Features of Sphenopalatine Foramen and Those Seen in Nasal Endoscopy]

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To study the clinical anatomy of the sphenopalatine foramina by dissecting the sphenopalatine foramina during Vidian nerve branch neurotomy. The anatomy and CBCT images of sphenopalatine foramen were analyzed to facilitate the navigational of clinical operation using CBCT images. From October 2017 to September 2023, 84 cases(168 sides) of Vidian nerve branch neurotomy in our department were collected. The clinical summary was made according to the anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen during the operation. Preoperative CBCT imaging findings of the sphenopalatine foramina were also studied. The clinical anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen could be divided into four types: middle meatus type(1.19%), trans-meatus type(62.29%), superior meatus type(33.33%) and double foramen type(1.19%). The incidence of ethmoidal ridge was 98.81%. The distance from sphenopalatine foramina to posterior nasal canal were(14.63±2.66) mm to left and(14.65±2.63) mm to right, The position Angle ∠a of lower margin of sphenopalatine foramina were(62.36±10.05)° to left and(61.51±11.82)° to right, respectively. Axial CT images can be used to divide the sphenopalatine foramen into five levels: the upper edge of the sphenopalatine foramen level, the Vidian nerve level, the basal plate interaction level, the lower edge of the sphenopalatine foramen level and the pterygopalatine canal level. The agreement between endoscopic anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen and imaging navigation was 100%. The sphenopalatine foramina exhibit various anatomical types. The preoperative navigational CBCT reading can effectively identify the type of sphenopalatine foramina, guide the choice of surgical method, and help avoid serious complications. This has significant clinical application value.

References
1.
Han M, Kim H, Choi J, Park D, Han J . Diagnostic usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography versus multi-detector computed tomography for sinonasal structure evaluation. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(3):662-670. PMC: 9195011. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.792. View

2.
Song Y, Gong S . [Study of cone-beam CT in evaluating the electrode array of cochlear implantation postoperatively]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018; 32(18):1371-1373. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.18.002. View

3.
Gu Y, Yu B, Wan X, Gu Y, Zhu G, Xiao Z . Effects of modified posterior nasal nerve neurectomy combined with accessory posterior nasal nerve neurectomy on controlling intractable allergic rhinitis. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023; 48(3):404-413. PMC: 10930075. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220593. View

4.
Herrera Tolosana S, Liesa R, Escolar Castellon J, Delgado L, Lisbona Alquezar M, Tejero-Garces Galve G . [Sphenopalatinum foramen: an anatomical study]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011; 62(4):274-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2011.01.009. View

5.
Veldhoen S, Schollchen M, Hanken H, Precht C, Henes F, Schon G . Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(2):790-800. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4387-2. View