Intersectional Socioeconomic Disparities in Continuous Smoking Through Pregnancy Among Pre-pregnant Smokers in Sweden Between 2006 and 2016

Overview

Journal BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Jul 6

PMID 38971755

Authors

Sten Axelsson Fisk

Jannike Cassel

Mikael Rostila

Can Liu

Sol Pia Juarez

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: While well-established associations exist between socioeconomic conditions and smoking during pregnancy (SDP), less is known about social disparities in the risk of continuous SDP. Intersectional analyses that consider multiple social factors simultaneously can offer valuable insight for planning smoking cessation interventions.

Methods: We include all 146,222 pregnancies in Sweden between 2006 and 2016 where the mother smoked at three months before pregnancy. The outcome was continuous SDP defined as self-reported smoking in the third trimester. Exposures were age, education, migration status and civil status. We examined all exposures in a mutually adjusted unidimensional analysis and in an intersectional model including 36 possible combinations. We present ORs with 95% Confidence Intervals, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) as a measure of discriminatory accuracy (DA).

Results: In our study, education status was the factor most strongly associated to continuous SDP among women who smoked at three months before pregnancy. In the unidimensional analysis women with low and middle education had ORs for continuous SDP of 6.92 (95%CI 6.63-7.22) and 3.06 (95%CI 2.94-3.18) respectively compared to women with high education. In the intersectional analysis, odds of continuous SDP were 17.50 (95%CI 14.56-21.03) for married women born in Sweden aged ≥ 35 years with low education, compared to the reference group of married women born in Sweden aged 25-34 with high education. AUC-values were 0.658 and 0.660 for the unidimensional and intersectional models, respectively.

Conclusion: The unidimensional and intersectional analyses showed that low education status increases odds of continuous SDP but that in isolation education status is insufficient to identify the women at highest odds of continuous SDP. Interventions targeted to social groups should be preceded by intersectional analyses but further research is needed before recommending intensified smoking cessation to specific social groups.

References

Madureira J, Camelo A, Silva A, Reis A, Esteves F, Ribeiro A . The importance of socioeconomic position in smoking, cessation and environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):15584. PMC: 7515871. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72298-8. View

Rygh E, Gallefoss F, GrOtvedt L . Trends in maternal use of snus and smoking tobacco in pregnancy. A register study in southern Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):500. PMC: 6915947. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2624-9. View

Axelsson Fisk S, Lindstrom M, Perez-Vicente R, Merlo J . Understanding the complexity of socioeconomic disparities in smoking prevalence in Sweden: a cross-sectional study applying intersectionality theory. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(2):e042323. PMC: 7880088. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042323. View

Anderson T, Lavista Ferres J, Ren S, Moon R, Goldstein R, Ramirez J . Maternal Smoking Before and During Pregnancy and the Risk of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death. Pediatrics. 2019; 143(4). PMC: 6564075. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3325. View

Lindstrom M, Sundquist J . Ethnic differences in daily smoking in Malmö, Sweden. Varying influence of psychosocial and economic factors. Eur J Public Health. 2003; 12(4):287-94. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/12.4.287. View

Caraballo R, Giovino G, Pechacek T, Mowery P . Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinine levels among persons aged 17 years or older: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(8):807-14. DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.8.807. View

Bender W, McCarthy C, Elovitz M, Parry S, Durnwald C . Universal HbA1c screening and gestational diabetes: a comparison with clinical risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 35(25):6430-6436. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1914578. View

Smedberg J, Lupattelli A, Mardby A, Nordeng H . Characteristics of women who continue smoking during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of pregnant women and new mothers in 15 European countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:213. PMC: 4080751. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-213. View

Vartiainen E, Seppala T, Lillsunde P, Puska P . Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(3):167-70. PMC: 1732104. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.3.167. View

10.

Zhu S, Valbo A . Depression and smoking during pregnancy. Addict Behav. 2002; 27(4):649-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00199-x. View

11.

Riaz M, Lewis S, Naughton F, Ussher M . Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2017; 113(4):610-622. DOI: 10.1111/add.14135. View

12.

Axelsson Fisk S, Alex-Petersen J, Rostila M, Liu C, Juarez S . Social inequalities in the risk of giving birth to a small for gestational age child in Sweden 2010-16: a cross-sectional study adopting an intersectional approach. Eur J Public Health. 2023; 34(1):22-28. PMC: 10843954. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad184. View

13.

Bauer G . Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 110:10-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022. View

14.

Bauld L, Bell K, McCullough L, Richardson L, Greaves L . The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009; 32(1):71-82. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp074. View

15.

Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Froen J, Smith G, Gibbons K . Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377(9774):1331-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7. View

16.

Schneider S, Huy C, Schutz J, Diehl K . Smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic literature review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010; 29(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00098.x. View

17.

Vila-Candel R, Navarro-Illana E, Mena-Tudela D, Perez-Ros P, Castro-Sanchez E, Soriano-Vidal F . Influence of Puerperal Health Literacy on Tobacco Use during Pregnancy among Spanish Women: A Transversal Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(8). PMC: 7216153. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082910. View

18.

Ekblad M, Gissler M, Korkeila J, Lehtonen L . Trends and risk groups for smoking during pregnancy in Finland and other Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health. 2013; 24(4):544-51. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt128. View

19.

Misan N, Korszun P, Gruca-Stryjak K, Paczkowska K, Nowak A, Wozniak P . Does predelivery body mass index really matter in pregnancy?. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(11):922-929. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2022.0005. View

20.

Mattsson K, Kallen K, Rignell-Hydbom A, Lindh C, Jonsson B, Gustafsson P . Cotinine Validation of Self-Reported Smoking During Pregnancy in the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 18(1):79-83. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv087. View