» Articles » PMID: 38970129

Prognostic Significance of Troponin in Patients with Malignancy (NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative TROP-MALIGNANCY Study)

Abstract

Background: Cardiac troponin is commonly raised in patients presenting with malignancy. The prognostic significance of raised troponin in these patients is unclear.

Objectives: We sought to investigate the relation between troponin and mortality in a large, well characterised cohort of patients with a routinely measured troponin and a primary diagnosis of malignancy.

Methods: We used the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative data of 5571 patients, who had troponin levels measured at 5 UK cardiac centres between 2010 and 2017 and had a primary diagnosis of malignancy. Patients were classified into solid tumour or haematological malignancy subgroups. Peak troponin levels were standardised as a multiple of each laboratory's 99th -percentile upper limit of normal (xULN).

Results: 4649 patients were diagnosed with solid tumours and 922 patients with haematological malignancies. Raised troponin was an independent predictor of mortality in all patients (Troponin > 10 vs. <1 adjusted HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.34), in solid tumours (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.19), and in haematological malignancy (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.99 to 3.72). There was a significant trend in increasing mortality risk across troponin categories in all three subgroups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Raised troponin level is associated with increased mortality in patients with a primary diagnosis of malignancy regardless of cancer subtype. Mortality risk is stable for patients with a troponin level below the ULN but increases as troponin level increases above the ULN in the absence of acute coronary syndrome.

Citing Articles

Imaging and Biomarkers: The Assesment of Pulmonary Embolism Risk and Early Mortality.

Naum A, Jari I, Moisii L, Ursu A, Moisii P Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(9).

PMID: 39336530 PMC: 11433879. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091489.

References
1.
Lyon A . Disparate worlds drawing closer together: cardiovascular biomarkers predict cancer outcomes in treatment-naïve patients. Heart. 2015; 101(23):1853-4. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308208. View

2.
Shah A, Anand A, Sandoval Y, Lee K, Smith S, Adamson P . High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015; 386(10012):2481-8. PMC: 4765710. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00391-8. View

3.
Pavo N, Raderer M, Hulsmann M, Neuhold S, Adlbrecht C, Strunk G . Cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with cancer and their association with all-cause mortality. Heart. 2015; 101(23):1874-80. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307848. View

4.
Balanescu D, Monlezun D, Donisan T, Boone D, Cervoni-Curet F, Palaskas N . A Cancer Paradox: Machine-Learning Backed Propensity-Score Analysis of Coronary Angiography Findings in Cardio-Oncology. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019; 31(1):21-26. DOI: 10.25270/jic/18.00215. View

5.
Kaura A, Sterne J, Trickey A, Abbott S, Mulla A, Glampson B . Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data. Lancet. 2020; 396(10251):623-634. PMC: 7456783. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2. View